New Posts For Thread: "The only one we can rule out is BENEFICIENT'https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficientThat one even makes 'The Omaha Kid' look goodwhat's the problem, pal?....OTS got confused, i have replied to his posts to clarify. cheers.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516326343#516326343what's the problem, pal?....OTS got confused, i have replied to his posts to clarify. cheers.Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:07:15 -0600duncan idaho get a life mate seriouslyhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516326187#516326187duncan idaho get a life mate seriouslyTue, 14 Feb 2012 02:59:34 -0600OTS, in his 23.29 post, he 'cleverly' spun it so that it seemed that you were agreeing with him that Beneficials are useless on soft grd and that your 'is this guy on drugs?' was aimed at me for disagreeing with that not him...or something like thathttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516325115#516325115OTS, in his 23.29 post, he 'cleverly' spun it so that it seemed that you were agreeing with him that Beneficials are useless on soft grd and that your 'is this guy on drugs?' was aimed at me for disagreeing with that not him...or something like thatTue, 14 Feb 2012 01:57:04 -0600apologies duncan,if that is the case,he didnt make himself very clear,although having read his comments on this thread,it appears to be a regular occurrencehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516313367#516313367apologies duncan,if that is the case,he didnt make himself very clear,although having read his comments on this thread,it appears to be a regular occurrenceMon, 13 Feb 2012 16:43:03 -0600Funny rory connections never mentioned the ground as an excuse for its Thurles flop, when interviwed post race on Sunday, owner said horse wasn't right and had an infection, no mention of this infection after the Thurles race or before the Leopardstohttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516312607#516312607Funny rory connections never mentioned the ground as an excuse for its Thurles flop, when interviwed post race on Sunday, owner said horse wasn't right and had an infection, no mention of this infection after the Thurles race or before the LeopardstoMon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:14 -0600i think he was referring to me, OTS (the film reference being My Own Private Idaho, which of course i'm not named after at all!). he's a funny fellow alrighthttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516312459#516312459i think he was referring to me, OTS (the film reference being My Own Private Idaho, which of course i'm not named after at all!). he's a funny fellow alrightMon, 13 Feb 2012 16:17:24 -0600snaff -- could be right,named himself after a drug induced film,but at least he offered some facts to back up niaevity,you usually get ,what a load of rubbish.i think you'll find my forum name is a Terminology used in the racing fraternity,Hope thishttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516311891#516311891snaff -- could be right,named himself after a drug induced film,but at least he offered some facts to back up niaevity,you usually get ,what a load of rubbish.i think you'll find my forum name is a Terminology used in the racing fraternity,Hope thisMon, 13 Feb 2012 16:03:27 -0600By the way the owner of Benefficient did back the horse as he said so in the post race interview.What about the other 30 people he had with him?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516292129#516292129By the way the owner of Benefficient did back the horse as he said so in the post race interview.What about the other 30 people he had with him?Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:02 -0600Well done to Kevin Blake of the Racing Post who put this one upas his selection in the pre race forum at Leopardstown.I owe that man a drink.Kevin said the horse couldn't handle the groundthe day it ran at Thurles,it was like glue.Note,another horsehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516289901#516289901Well done to Kevin Blake of the Racing Post who put this one upas his selection in the pre race forum at Leopardstown.I owe that man a drink.Kevin said the horse couldn't handle the groundthe day it ran at Thurles,it was like glue.Note,another horseMon, 13 Feb 2012 05:46:37 -0600whatever way you look at it, it's safe to say that even connections didn't fancy it yesterday. when you see the number of people in the winners enclosure afterwards, then you know that they didn't back it either, otherwise it would never have startedhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28913621/the-only-one-we-can-rule-out-is-beneficient?post_id=516288453#516288453whatever way you look at it, it's safe to say that even connections didn't fancy it yesterday. when you see the number of people in the winners enclosure afterwards, then you know that they didn't back it either, otherwise it would never have startedMon, 13 Feb 2012 04:36:42 -0600