<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: stewards?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards</link><description>shirley</description><item><title>Believe me you dont want to go back to the old rules.In my lifetime of betting I've had horses win by over 3 lenghts and thrown out just for crossing the 2nd with a faint brush,all the stewards ever needed was an excuse to change a result if it suite</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516139097#516139097</link><description>Believe me you dont want to go back to the old rules.In my lifetime of betting I've had horses win by over 3 lenghts and thrown out just for crossing the 2nd with a faint brush,all the stewards ever needed was an excuse to change a result if it suite</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:12:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>marcce good post. With the rules of yesteryear plenty of horses that were easily the best on the day were thrown out and as you say on top of that you never knew what was going to happen.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138997#516138997</link><description>marcce good post. With the rules of yesteryear plenty of horses that were easily the best on the day were thrown out and as you say on top of that you never knew what was going to happen.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:10:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>As with this and the Harry Redknapp case you new what the result would be.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138711#516138711</link><description>As with this and the Harry Redknapp case you new what the result would be.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:03:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>winning jockey --3 day banbest to remember--punishment  &amp; race win are seperate</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138693#516138693</link><description>winning jockey --3 day banbest to remember--punishment  &amp; race win are seperate</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:03:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>well it's funny cos in 2 days i've lost out both ways in the states and over here.last night my winner in states knocked a horse on its inside on the home turn at turf paradise and scooted clear to win easily, i had it to place and it was chucked out</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138395#516138395</link><description>well it's funny cos in 2 days i've lost out both ways in the states and over here.last night my winner in states knocked a horse on its inside on the home turn at turf paradise and scooted clear to win easily, i had it to place and it was chucked out</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:56:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In a nutshell, the rules are WRONG because they heavily favour the offender.correct. under the current rules, to get the verdict in an an enquiry the beaten horse must finish within a short head or nose of the winner. this means that all serious case</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138287#516138287</link><description>In a nutshell, the rules are WRONG because they heavily favour the offender.correct. under the current rules, to get the verdict in an an enquiry the beaten horse must finish within a short head or nose of the winner. this means that all serious case</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:53:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>horseracing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138255#516138255</link><description>horseracing</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:53:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The rules are fine as they are. The reason? It lessens the chances of inconsistencies in the enquiries. You pretty much know anything beaten over half a length isn't likely to get a race and that's fine with me when it means that principle is applied</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138215#516138215</link><description>The rules are fine as they are. The reason? It lessens the chances of inconsistencies in the enquiries. You pretty much know anything beaten over half a length isn't likely to get a race and that's fine with me when it means that principle is applied</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:52:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Girl couldve lost balance,  fell off , fractured skullbut winner keeps race .. what does she need to do , tool up to whack the fecker next time ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138175#516138175</link><description>Girl couldve lost balance,  fell off , fractured skullbut winner keeps race .. what does she need to do , tool up to whack the fecker next time ?</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:51:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>FFS, he's a 58 rated horse, he's not going to accelerate like Dayjur once he's been badly hampered like that.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28907317/stewards?post_id=516138105#516138105</link><description>FFS, he's a 58 rated horse, he's not going to accelerate like Dayjur once he's been badly hampered like that.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:49:58 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
