<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Dodgy dealings imo.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28620881/dodgy-dealings-imo</link><description>Anyone know what time Rosenblatt was declared a non runner for the 5pm Yarmouth race?was it just after 3pm by any chance not long after lad brokes cut it from 8/1 to 5/1? whenever it was it looks another dodgy rule 4 manipulation to me. i know it's o</description><item><title>i think it was 15:04 if oddschecker are to be believed and they cut the price to 5/1 at 14:58. absolutely fekin shameless. they have been getting away with it so long they are totally blatant about it now.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28620881/dodgy-dealings-imo?post_id=511666097#511666097</link><description>i think it was 15:04 if oddschecker are to be believed and they cut the price to 5/1 at 14:58. absolutely fekin shameless. they have been getting away with it so long they are totally blatant about it now.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:00:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Around 5 past 3 imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28620881/dodgy-dealings-imo?post_id=511665827#511665827</link><description>Around 5 past 3 imo</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:54:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Anyone know what time Rosenblatt was declared a non runner for the 5pm Yarmouth race?was it just after 3pm by any chance not long after lad brokes cut it from 8/1 to 5/1? whenever it was it looks another dodgy rule 4 manipulation to me. i know it's o</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28620881/dodgy-dealings-imo?post_id=511665283#511665283</link><description>Anyone know what time Rosenblatt was declared a non runner for the 5pm Yarmouth race?was it just after 3pm by any chance not long after lad brokes cut it from 8/1 to 5/1? whenever it was it looks another dodgy rule 4 manipulation to me. i know it's o</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:43:24 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
