<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: A simple solution to the whip issue?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue</link><description>To me the whole thing seems so ridiculously complicated, why not instead of giving out bans, loss of money etc, just make one simple rule:if you break the rules, the horse is disqualified. Surely at a stroke (pun intended) you would remove any issue</description><item><title>The RSPCA has long been the most pro-racing of the animal charities.The analogy with football is false because it is a team game, and because it's timeframe allows for in-game sanctions. If a footballer scores from an offside position, the goal is di</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511565719#511565719</link><description>The RSPCA has long been the most pro-racing of the animal charities.The analogy with football is false because it is a team game, and because it's timeframe allows for in-game sanctions. If a footballer scores from an offside position, the goal is di</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:28:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Players cheat all the time in football. They dive to get a pen or a player sent off.They handball to control the ball and score.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511565201#511565201</link><description>Players cheat all the time in football. They dive to get a pen or a player sent off.They handball to control the ball and score.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:13:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>How many sports exist where you are allowed to break the rules and still win?A foul in football is breaking the rules. Does the team get disqualified? No.What would happen if that happened?British football will end. The leagues would finish.There wil</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511564977#511564977</link><description>How many sports exist where you are allowed to break the rules and still win?A foul in football is breaking the rules. Does the team get disqualified? No.What would happen if that happened?British football will end. The leagues would finish.There wil</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 07:07:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well that worked really well Ramruma.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511563821#511563821</link><description>Well that worked really well Ramruma.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:31:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The guideline figure was six a few years ago.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511563539#511563539</link><description>The guideline figure was six a few years ago.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:21:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is where the 7 hit rule is crazy, why on earth any jockey thought this figure was a good idea</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511563301#511563301</link><description>This is where the 7 hit rule is crazy, why on earth any jockey thought this figure was a good idea</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:12:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I totally agree that we can't have horses being disqualified wrt betting but the disincentive of losing the race wrt prize money should be there. I suggested elsewhere that, after the weigh-in so betting isn't affected, they add a distance per extra</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511562809#511562809</link><description>I totally agree that we can't have horses being disqualified wrt betting but the disincentive of losing the race wrt prize money should be there. I suggested elsewhere that, after the weigh-in so betting isn't affected, they add a distance per extra</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:56:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think Graham Cunningham referred to the disqualification of horses for whip offences as the "nuke" option.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511562485#511562485</link><description>I think Graham Cunningham referred to the disqualification of horses for whip offences as the "nuke" option.</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:44:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In the end it wouldn't come down to stewards and jockeys but how many wealthy owners were involved in litigation against the BHA to get their prize money back. Most owners are out of pocket keeping racehorses. How many would stick it if the BHA were</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511559051#511559051</link><description>In the end it wouldn't come down to stewards and jockeys but how many wealthy owners were involved in litigation against the BHA to get their prize money back. Most owners are out of pocket keeping racehorses. How many would stick it if the BHA were</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:36:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Regarding Onlookers' point about ''amatuer stewards'' and the worry about disqualification. I thought the new rules removed the previously subjective decision of what was ok and what wasn't; there's a number allowed, over that and it's not allowed, s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28608503/a-simple-solution-to-the-whip-issue?post_id=511558373#511558373</link><description>Regarding Onlookers' point about ''amatuer stewards'' and the worry about disqualification. I thought the new rules removed the previously subjective decision of what was ok and what wasn't; there's a number allowed, over that and it's not allowed, s</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:02:27 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
