<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: i backed so you think..can i sue?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue</link><description>If a jockey can sue for his winning percentage back in this (ridiculous) situation is there any difference in a punter suing the BHA for return of winnings due to the winner not being disqualified?</description><item><title>You have ovelrlooked something hereYou would have to PROVE that the whip was the sole reason the horse won and that my friend is impossible.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510074711#510074711</link><description>You have ovelrlooked something hereYou would have to PROVE that the whip was the sole reason the horse won and that my friend is impossible.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:57:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The sport like the banks who control the politics run by idiots!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510074599#510074599</link><description>The sport like the banks who control the politics run by idiots!</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:54:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Its pretty clear that soumillon as at least a reasonable case in court...But..if i was to sue the BHA....what chance would i have of recovering my money having backed so you think</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510074497#510074497</link><description>Its pretty clear that soumillon as at least a reasonable case in court...But..if i was to sue the BHA....what chance would i have of recovering my money having backed so you think</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:51:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If an employer introduced a rule you can have say 5 cigarette breaks a week and someone is seen on cctv going for 6. They then decide to fine this employee his weeks wages, would the courts not come down on the side of this person? For me the penalty</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510073239#510073239</link><description>If an employer introduced a rule you can have say 5 cigarette breaks a week and someone is seen on cctv going for 6. They then decide to fine this employee his weeks wages, would the courts not come down on the side of this person? For me the penalty</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:08:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>iwould be amazed if soumi dosent bring them to court!one smack of the whip and they decide not to pay him?  facking daylight robbery, the whole BHA organisation needs looking in to, should be locked up in 'straight' jackets!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510073087#510073087</link><description>iwould be amazed if soumi dosent bring them to court!one smack of the whip and they decide not to pay him?  facking daylight robbery, the whole BHA organisation needs looking in to, should be locked up in 'straight' jackets!</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:02:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Didn't the courts go over the heads of football authorities to introduce the 'Bosman Rule'? Couldn't they also go over the heads of the racing authorities? Just because a rule is introduced to a sport doesn't automatically mean it is sustainable in t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510072819#510072819</link><description>Didn't the courts go over the heads of football authorities to introduce the 'Bosman Rule'? Couldn't they also go over the heads of the racing authorities? Just because a rule is introduced to a sport doesn't automatically mean it is sustainable in t</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:51:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Please assume for the sake of argument that the first statement is true and he wins.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510072577#510072577</link><description>Please assume for the sake of argument that the first statement is true and he wins.</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:43:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If a jockey can sue for his winning percentage back in this (ridiculous) situation is there any difference in a punter suing the BHA for return of winnings due to the winner not being disqualified?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28521589/i-backed-so-you-thinkcan-i-sue?post_id=510072547#510072547</link><description>If a jockey can sue for his winning percentage back in this (ridiculous) situation is there any difference in a punter suing the BHA for return of winnings due to the winner not being disqualified?</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 06:42:17 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
