<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: IMMORTAL VERSE to place @ 1.85 is better bet than FRANKEL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel</link><description>Just common sense. Why back a horse to win @ 1.40, when you can back a horse who will almost certainly place @ 1.85 ????no brainer</description><item><title>Frankel @1.40 was a good a bet as you'll see</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031909#510031909</link><description>Frankel @1.40 was a good a bet as you'll see</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:51:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>more than double the price of FRANKEL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031679#510031679</link><description>more than double the price of FRANKEL</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:48:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>pacemaker nearly did for himjust held on, but you get PAID!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031665#510031665</link><description>pacemaker nearly did for himjust held on, but you get PAID!</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:48:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Lucky to hold on there</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031615#510031615</link><description>Lucky to hold on there</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:47:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>there are easily 3 that could beat her</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031317#510031317</link><description>there are easily 3 that could beat her</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:42:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>^^ does it like the all weather at kempton?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031269#510031269</link><description>^^ does it like the all weather at kempton?</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:41:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>place lay,wont like the ground</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031185#510031185</link><description>place lay,wont like the ground</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:39:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>the higher the odds the better</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031131#510031131</link><description>the higher the odds the better</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:38:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1.98 now.. good price imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510031071#510031071</link><description>1.98 now.. good price imo</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:37:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just common sense. Why back a horse to win @ 1.40, when you can back a horse who will almost certainly place @ 1.85 ????no brainer</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515561/immortal-verse-to-place-185-is-better-bet-than-frankel?post_id=510030905#510030905</link><description>Just common sense. Why back a horse to win @ 1.40, when you can back a horse who will almost certainly place @ 1.85 ????no brainer</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:34:03 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
