<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Well that proves sectional times as bollox</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox</link><description>All that mantra before the race by James, and the winner blows them away going 'too fast'.</description><item><title>maybe he wasnt 100% on faster grd than ideal after 3-months off? who knows. Sectionals only small part of the puzzle.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510036391#510036391</link><description>maybe he wasnt 100% on faster grd than ideal after 3-months off? who knows. Sectionals only small part of the puzzle.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:10:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Nathaniels a 12f bog horse....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510036211#510036211</link><description>Nathaniels a 12f bog horse....</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:07:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd like to use them, and I agree they ought to be really useful, but I still can't have it that Nathaniel can't run similar sectionals to Dancing Rain even over a similar sort of distance type but still not be vying for a place at the end.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510036089#510036089</link><description>I'd like to use them, and I agree they ought to be really useful, but I still can't have it that Nathaniel can't run similar sectionals to Dancing Rain even over a similar sort of distance type but still not be vying for a place at the end.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:05:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I havent got the will to give you a proper answer, mate.....mainly because i think you've made your mind up already....i'm not saying i'm right and you're wrong but they work for me. Cheers.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035845#510035845</link><description>I havent got the will to give you a proper answer, mate.....mainly because i think you've made your mind up already....i'm not saying i'm right and you're wrong but they work for me. Cheers.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:01:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>can't compare different distances just like that.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035711#510035711</link><description>can't compare different distances just like that.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:59:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>have any of the 3 stooges operating on trac k tipped a winner frankel apart,pre race yet,they seem very good post race</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035599#510035599</link><description>have any of the 3 stooges operating on trac k tipped a winner frankel apart,pre race yet,they seem very good post race</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:58:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You can't give me a proper answer, you are just saying there is always an excuse if the sectionals don't work out.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035555#510035555</link><description>You can't give me a proper answer, you are just saying there is always an excuse if the sectionals don't work out.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:57:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>yep, they're not for you, CS. Cheers.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035481#510035481</link><description>yep, they're not for you, CS. Cheers.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:55:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'll have me turf sectionals done by next March hopefully...lol..</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035399#510035399</link><description>I'll have me turf sectionals done by next March hopefully...lol..</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:54:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Both are proper Group 1 performers, why shouldn't they do the same splits. That's my point, of course a lower grade horse would fold up, but they can't be too far apart on class, and both can be noted as front runners.It's all well and good using sec</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28515369/well-that-proves-sectional-times-as-bollox?post_id=510035317#510035317</link><description>Both are proper Group 1 performers, why shouldn't they do the same splits. That's my point, of course a lower grade horse would fold up, but they can't be too far apart on class, and both can be noted as front runners.It's all well and good using sec</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:52:41 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
