<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: 6 hits in one furlong should have been a ban under old rules too imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28510505/6-hits-in-one-furlong-should-have-been-a-ban-under-old-rules-too-imo</link><description>How can hitting a horse more than once every 6 strides (i've counted and horse takes around 30 strides in final furlong) be considered as giving it time to respond between smacks?  5 should be plenty and if Hughes cant be bothered to try to apply him</description><item><title>Not at all. Why would you think that?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28510505/6-hits-in-one-furlong-should-have-been-a-ban-under-old-rules-too-imo?post_id=509977375#509977375</link><description>Not at all. Why would you think that?</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:03:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Fishing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28510505/6-hits-in-one-furlong-should-have-been-a-ban-under-old-rules-too-imo?post_id=509977209#509977209</link><description>Fishing</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:55:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>How can hitting a horse more than once every 6 strides (i've counted and horse takes around 30 strides in final furlong) be considered as giving it time to respond between smacks?  5 should be plenty and if Hughes cant be bothered to try to apply him</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28510505/6-hits-in-one-furlong-should-have-been-a-ban-under-old-rules-too-imo?post_id=509977151#509977151</link><description>How can hitting a horse more than once every 6 strides (i've counted and horse takes around 30 strides in final furlong) be considered as giving it time to respond between smacks?  5 should be plenty and if Hughes cant be bothered to try to apply him</description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:54:02 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
