New Posts For Thread: Rating for a 5 length Arc winner?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winnerWith the right connections it would get something like 138. Wonder what they'll give Danedream?Agree with Sterling she'll be treated like a german bolt from the blue and rated on the performances of the vanquished rather than her electric turn of foot.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507490365#507490365Agree with Sterling she'll be treated like a german bolt from the blue and rated on the performances of the vanquished rather than her electric turn of foot.Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:44:17 -0500134https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507490071#507490071134Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:32:19 -0500I think she will be rated as "obscure" and "German" and a host of excuses for the whole of the rest of the field and a Soviet linesman will come into play giving her an unjustly low rating.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507489303#507489303I think she will be rated as "obscure" and "German" and a host of excuses for the whole of the rest of the field and a Soviet linesman will come into play giving her an unjustly low rating.Mon, 03 Oct 2011 04:55:40 -0500I remember being really p1ssed off when they rated Pebbles lower than Slip Anchor.The flashy colts always seem to get higher than the brilliant filies.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507488015#507488015I remember being really p1ssed off when they rated Pebbles lower than Slip Anchor.The flashy colts always seem to get higher than the brilliant filies.Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:35:31 -0500Probably reasonable to assume the horses bunched up between 2nd and 7th ran to about 123/124 , so 133 ish for the winner IMOThough agree with AT on how this works . If you swapped the finishing positions of So You Think and Danedream, the placed horshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507478009#507478009Probably reasonable to assume the horses bunched up between 2nd and 7th ran to about 123/124 , so 133 ish for the winner IMOThough agree with AT on how this works . If you swapped the finishing positions of So You Think and Danedream, the placed horsSun, 02 Oct 2011 17:13:18 -0500I'll say 132 if we're all having a go.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507476467#507476467I'll say 132 if we're all having a go.Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:28:10 -0500137https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507468425#507468425137Sun, 02 Oct 2011 13:00:42 -0500I have it on 141. the highest since Comrade.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507468115#507468115I have it on 141. the highest since Comrade.Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:52:19 -0500actually sorry that should have been 124/125 minimumhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507467769#507467769actually sorry that should have been 124/125 minimumSun, 02 Oct 2011 12:42:54 -0500Depends on speed figure, I'd go 128, as the Snow Fairy, SYT formline stayed solid imhohttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28314701/rating-for-a-5-length-arc-winner?post_id=507467701#507467701Depends on speed figure, I'd go 128, as the Snow Fairy, SYT formline stayed solid imhoSun, 02 Oct 2011 12:40:54 -0500