New Posts For Thread: I'll NEVER bet on a photo or a stewards againhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-againThey are unbelievable, they have nailed another nail in the coffin lid of racing with that appaling decision.Shamefulnotwhatwho 02 May 16:12 do bookies cover lucky 15s with their double result thing?been a while since i've been in a bookies mate but it was always double result only on singles then.did you have Jacqueline in the L15 then?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846366#430846366notwhatwho 02 May 16:12 do bookies cover lucky 15s with their double result thing?been a while since i've been in a bookies mate but it was always double result only on singles then.did you have Jacqueline in the L15 then?Sun, 02 May 2010 10:26:54 -0500"I'll NEVER bet on a photo or a stewards again"I suggest for your own financial future that you follow your own advice as you clearly haven't as yet grasped an understanding of the rules of racing.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846362#430846362"I'll NEVER bet on a photo or a stewards again"I suggest for your own financial future that you follow your own advice as you clearly haven't as yet grasped an understanding of the rules of racing.Sun, 02 May 2010 10:26:37 -0500SLB 02 May 16:11 IMO they are pretty consistent. If there's interference and it's a nose or a short head, it'll go. Otherwise it stands. you are right they are pretty consistent but in a different way.if a favourite is first past the post the reshttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846358#430846358SLB 02 May 16:11 IMO they are pretty consistent. If there's interference and it's a nose or a short head, it'll go. Otherwise it stands. you are right they are pretty consistent but in a different way.if a favourite is first past the post the resSun, 02 May 2010 10:22:48 -0500Thet do not reverse enough results imo, far too much contact in the game over here. I would not go as far as the Americans, but at least their jocks know where they stand.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846354#430846354Thet do not reverse enough results imo, far too much contact in the game over here. I would not go as far as the Americans, but at least their jocks know where they stand.Sun, 02 May 2010 10:17:00 -0500Zoey said on ATR that the race would go to one of the two horses in the enquiryhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846350#430846350Zoey said on ATR that the race would go to one of the two horses in the enquirySun, 02 May 2010 10:15:43 -0500it only won by 3 inches. the merest suggestion of interference is going to be enough to change the result.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846346#430846346it only won by 3 inches. the merest suggestion of interference is going to be enough to change the result.Sun, 02 May 2010 10:13:55 -0500do bookies cover lucky 15s with their double result thing?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846342#430846342do bookies cover lucky 15s with their double result thing?Sun, 02 May 2010 10:12:52 -0500race is a joke due to the extreme bias on the track .....the decision that followed is IRonic ..RACING JUST SHOT ITSELF IN THE FACE ..............GAME OVERhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846338#430846338race is a joke due to the extreme bias on the track .....the decision that followed is IRonic ..RACING JUST SHOT ITSELF IN THE FACE ..............GAME OVERSun, 02 May 2010 10:11:41 -0500IMO they are pretty consistent. If there's interference and it's a nose or a short head, it'll go. Otherwise it stands.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846334#430846334IMO they are pretty consistent. If there's interference and it's a nose or a short head, it'll go. Otherwise it stands.Sun, 02 May 2010 10:11:02 -0500no one is saying its actually wrong decision, what were saying is that from watching thousands of races in last few years no way do they reverse for so slight, just simple consistency if they continue todays rules then expect 3/4 reverse decisions ehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23906246/ill-never-bet-on-a-photo-or-a-stewards-again?post_id=430846330#430846330no one is saying its actually wrong decision, what were saying is that from watching thousands of races in last few years no way do they reverse for so slight, just simple consistency if they continue todays rules then expect 3/4 reverse decisions eSun, 02 May 2010 10:10:12 -0500