<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: aintree bookmakers</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers</link><description>all bookmakers who bet 1/5th the odds first four on the grand national should have their licence stopped! names can be provided!!!!!!!</description><item><title>ttt</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556118#430556118</link><description>ttt</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:05:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>hazell was a fifth on the national</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556114#430556114</link><description>hazell was a fifth on the national</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:36:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I noticed threee books on the rails at Aintree offering 1/5 odds on 16-21 runner handicaps, Johnson, Cook,Hughes.The remainder were all offering the standard 1/4 and seemingly running their business, despite a non level playing field.However,what the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556110#430556110</link><description>I noticed threee books on the rails at Aintree offering 1/5 odds on 16-21 runner handicaps, Johnson, Cook,Hughes.The remainder were all offering the standard 1/4 and seemingly running their business, despite a non level playing field.However,what the</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:28:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>bookmakers who stray from standard terms have no right to judge anyone.FACT</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556106#430556106</link><description>bookmakers who stray from standard terms have no right to judge anyone.FACT</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:09:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>as ever they had a bigger q than the two betting 1/5th odds</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556102#430556102</link><description>as ever they had a bigger q than the two betting 1/5th odds</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:21:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>so its ok so long as it is displayed well i had a walk down to the 3rd ring at pontefract yesterday and a firm called easton were betting a 1/7th yet covered up the board where it displays the place terms with a gamecare sign so you only got to find</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556098#430556098</link><description>so its ok so long as it is displayed well i had a walk down to the 3rd ring at pontefract yesterday and a firm called easton were betting a 1/7th yet covered up the board where it displays the place terms with a gamecare sign so you only got to find</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:20:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Are these threads started by bookies who can't keep up/compete/jealous they can't change place odds to a sixth etc...or actual irate punters on track who thinks it's a disgrace?Just wondering... :^0</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556094#430556094</link><description>Are these threads started by bookies who can't keep up/compete/jealous they can't change place odds to a sixth etc...or actual irate punters on track who thinks it's a disgrace?Just wondering... :^0</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:53:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The Magician (100) 13 Apr 22:06 I asked hills for 1250 eway a 9/1 chance - they said 600 eway.... I walked away The Magician - where was this?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556090#430556090</link><description>The Magician (100) 13 Apr 22:06 I asked hills for 1250 eway a 9/1 chance - they said 600 eway.... I walked away The Magician - where was this?</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:48:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>wasnot and mr crisp,hopefully schemes a little like your suggestions are not far away,it may put an end to some of these problems,and hopefully lead the public to proper place odds.By the way i think it is my right to call the book next to me (who be</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556086#430556086</link><description>wasnot and mr crisp,hopefully schemes a little like your suggestions are not far away,it may put an end to some of these problems,and hopefully lead the public to proper place odds.By the way i think it is my right to call the book next to me (who be</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:53:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>if people are worried about the implications of naming the bookmakers offering less than standard terms. why not go the other way and recommend by their trade names the one,s in your opinion that offer standard terms in all but the most exepional cir</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23880118/aintree-bookmakers?post_id=430556082#430556082</link><description>if people are worried about the implications of naming the bookmakers offering less than standard terms. why not go the other way and recommend by their trade names the one,s in your opinion that offer standard terms in all but the most exepional cir</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:30:36 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
