New Posts For Thread: so does that mean they had no intention of running tat in grand annualhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annualruby says he wasnt right and looked off colour before chelters. bit disapointed that paul didnt just tell us that instead of saying we dont know whether hes good enough and that . shows what the drift was about in the weeks uptop the raceGood chance tomorrow imo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=430659686#430659686Good chance tomorrow imo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:20:26 -0500What drift ,Dananders ? He was well backed until it rained. He was pulled out because of the ground.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=423411966#423411966What drift ,Dananders ? He was well backed until it rained. He was pulled out because of the ground.Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:25:25 -0500Strange, that one.In his pre-Cheltenham Stable Tour, Nicholls said that they were originally going to aim for the Novice Chase at Cheltenham - but, because they thought that the horse was well handicapped (as it obviously was, having trounced now 134https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=423411962#423411962Strange, that one.In his pre-Cheltenham Stable Tour, Nicholls said that they were originally going to aim for the Novice Chase at Cheltenham - but, because they thought that the horse was well handicapped (as it obviously was, having trounced now 134Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:46:13 -0500Ruby said the horse wasnt right.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=423411958#423411958Ruby said the horse wasnt right.Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:38:54 -0500disapointed with paul hes better than thathttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=423411954#423411954disapointed with paul hes better than thatSat, 10 Apr 2010 08:38:11 -0500ruby says he wasnt right and looked off colour before chelters. bit disapointed that paul didnt just tell us that instead of saying we dont know whether hes good enough and that . shows what the drift was about in the weeks uptop the racehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23634542/so-does-that-mean-they-had-no-intention-of-running-tat-in-grand-annual?post_id=423411950#423411950ruby says he wasnt right and looked off colour before chelters. bit disapointed that paul didnt just tell us that instead of saying we dont know whether hes good enough and that . shows what the drift was about in the weeks uptop the raceSat, 10 Apr 2010 08:35:34 -0500