New Posts For Thread: Royal Acclamation should win handily enoughhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enoughprice at 7-1 is way too big. I have him at 9-2. goodluckGave that a dire ride, reigned back after the start off a slow pace. Bloody horse had raced in touch last time with success, why hold him up ffs.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812678#422812678Gave that a dire ride, reigned back after the start off a slow pace. Bloody horse had raced in touch last time with success, why hold him up ffs.Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:14:07 -0500the jockey has an 11% strike rate on the AW over the last 5 years, so he is not that bad. you have to take a chance sometimes, I guess that is why they call it gambling.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812646#422812646the jockey has an 11% strike rate on the AW over the last 5 years, so he is not that bad. you have to take a chance sometimes, I guess that is why they call it gambling.Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:11:05 -05003rd would have won with clear wonhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812606#4228126063rd would have won with clear wonWed, 07 Apr 2010 11:06:53 -0500unlucky 2b fairhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812598#422812598unlucky 2b fairWed, 07 Apr 2010 11:06:35 -0500I thought it should have placed at least.https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812594#422812594I thought it should have placed at least.Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:06:02 -0500If you put a jockey on him that wasn't blind it might have stood a chance..........https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812590#422812590If you put a jockey on him that wasn't blind it might have stood a chance..........Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:05:46 -0500good luck with your next venturehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812582#422812582good luck with your next ventureWed, 07 Apr 2010 11:04:52 -0500and the next 1 please ?https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812570#422812570and the next 1 please ?Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:03:58 -0500D"OH!https://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812498#422812498D"OH!Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:56:33 -0500price at 7-1 is way too big. I have him at 9-2. goodluckhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/23603054/royal-acclamation-should-win-handily-enough?post_id=422812494#422812494price at 7-1 is way too big. I have him at 9-2. goodluckWed, 07 Apr 2010 10:55:55 -0500