<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Big Bucks for the National</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national</link><description>Rated 153 over fences, and since it's now almost impossible to fall, why not? He could start odds on if he wins at Cheltenham first:)</description><item><title>You are missing my pointI have no pet theory,i don't care what weight a horse carries.It is a fact of saturdays race.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531144007#531144007</link><description>You are missing my pointI have no pet theory,i don't care what weight a horse carries.It is a fact of saturdays race.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:45:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And the year before the winner carried 11-0 and the third 11-10. In 2010 the first 2 home and 5 of the first 10 had over 11 stone. With respect, I think you are picking statistics out selectively to try and support a pet theory rather than really ana</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531141061#531141061</link><description>And the year before the winner carried 11-0 and the third 11-10. In 2010 the first 2 home and 5 of the first 10 had over 11 stone. With respect, I think you are picking statistics out selectively to try and support a pet theory rather than really ana</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:11:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well it was 2 out of 11,or for place purposes 4 out of first five home.Same again this year 1 out of first 10 home carried above 11 stone,and 1 out of first 5.Not conclusive,but please do not ignore.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531130017#531130017</link><description>Well it was 2 out of 11,or for place purposes 4 out of first five home.Same again this year 1 out of first 10 home carried above 11 stone,and 1 out of first 5.Not conclusive,but please do not ignore.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:19:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"In last years race only 2 out of the first 10 home were above 11 stone"20%As only 10 horses carried above 11 stone (25%) that is hardly conclusive one way or the other.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531120013#531120013</link><description>"In last years race only 2 out of the first 10 home were above 11 stone"20%As only 10 horses carried above 11 stone (25%) that is hardly conclusive one way or the other.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 03:43:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>GCWFreak year,i don't think so.In last years race only 2 out the first 10 home above were above 11 stone.When you get well handicapped National(welsh/scots ect)specialists you should expect to find them going close.Since Comply or die won,these kinds</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531114411#531114411</link><description>GCWFreak year,i don't think so.In last years race only 2 out the first 10 home above were above 11 stone.When you get well handicapped National(welsh/scots ect)specialists you should expect to find them going close.Since Comply or die won,these kinds</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:40:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You couldn't conclude that from this year's race, no. Most of the horses over 11 stone jumped or ran appallingly and wouldn't have made the frame with a stone less. The way I see it, the handicap used to be based on the same 1lb per length basis as n</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531106471#531106471</link><description>You couldn't conclude that from this year's race, no. Most of the horses over 11 stone jumped or ran appallingly and wouldn't have made the frame with a stone less. The way I see it, the handicap used to be based on the same 1lb per length basis as n</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:20:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Do you think the weight stat has any relevance again or was it just a freak year? Only teaforthree ran with any credit from those above 11 stone.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531094099#531094099</link><description>Do you think the weight stat has any relevance again or was it just a freak year? Only teaforthree ran with any credit from those above 11 stone.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:55:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>if Long Run gets pointed at the race I'd go for him. Seeing the requirement now is just and out and out stayer...Back In Focus ought to command a fair degree of respect. Might see a throw back to really old days when the 4miler at Cheltenham was pret</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531091267#531091267</link><description>if Long Run gets pointed at the race I'd go for him. Seeing the requirement now is just and out and out stayer...Back In Focus ought to command a fair degree of respect. Might see a throw back to really old days when the 4miler at Cheltenham was pret</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:30:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Those fences looked a lot easier than fixed brush hurdles so why not</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531074325#531074325</link><description>Those fences looked a lot easier than fixed brush hurdles so why not</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 12:47:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/29849041/big-bucks-for-the-national?post_id=531068923#531068923</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 09:45:10 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
