New Posts For Thread: How can anyone argue that Sea The Stars should be rated higher than Harbingerhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbingerYou can only rate a horse by how far it beats its rivals. Sea the Stars never won by far enough to get a rating as high as Harbinger achieved yesterday. Does not mean that Sea The Stars wouldn't have been able to achieve a better rating given thuntil he does it again at least once it should be trewated as a hawk wing lockinge performance!!https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=459004013#459004013until he does it again at least once it should be trewated as a hawk wing lockinge performance!!Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:55:51 -0500Officialy rated 135 which seems sensible - just slightly erring on the side of caution.https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458990301#458990301Officialy rated 135 which seems sensible - just slightly erring on the side of caution.Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:16:29 -0500Harbinger's wide margin win looks rock solid. St Nicholas Abbey's win was achieved in a slow time so questionable wether it is as good as it looks. Workforce's Derby win was a strange race with the 2nd seeming to blast off too fast forhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458988481#458988481Harbinger's wide margin win looks rock solid. St Nicholas Abbey's win was achieved in a slow time so questionable wether it is as good as it looks. Workforce's Derby win was a strange race with the 2nd seeming to blast off too fast forMon, 26 Jul 2010 10:02:34 -0500Harbinger needs to win at least 2 more Group 1s before he enters great horses discussions.https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458972481#458972481Harbinger needs to win at least 2 more Group 1s before he enters great horses discussions.Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:38:45 -0500Fecken hell theres been three horse since STS that have all suppose to have been better than him. First we had St Nicholas Abbey the next great thing after a wide margin Racingpost...gets stuffed in the Guineas! That was only a blip Workforce was thehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458972193#458972193Fecken hell theres been three horse since STS that have all suppose to have been better than him. First we had St Nicholas Abbey the next great thing after a wide margin Racingpost...gets stuffed in the Guineas! That was only a blip Workforce was theMon, 26 Jul 2010 07:35:31 -0500Harbinger = the new Worforce imohttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458965677#458965677Harbinger = the new Worforce imoMon, 26 Jul 2010 06:18:20 -0500As I see it the ratings are inline with the way these things have always been evaluated, race by race. Do I think this makes Harbinger a better horse than STS? Not by a long way at this moment in time.https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458963165#458963165As I see it the ratings are inline with the way these things have always been evaluated, race by race. Do I think this makes Harbinger a better horse than STS? Not by a long way at this moment in time.Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:42:38 -0500As I see it the ratings are as they should be based on the way they are evaluated. Do I think this makes Harbinger a better horse than STS? Not by a long way at this moment in time.https://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458963005#458963005As I see it the ratings are as they should be based on the way they are evaluated. Do I think this makes Harbinger a better horse than STS? Not by a long way at this moment in time.Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:40:46 -0500a good-natured threadhttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458954289#458954289a good-natured threadMon, 26 Jul 2010 03:03:42 -0500good reply uncle puncle, sts over a mile in the 2000 beat ghan amrhas and delegator the former need to say more the latter group2 at best ., rvw in the places , but are we massively , overrating rvw , the only horse that he beat and has shown himsehttps://community.betfair.com/horse_antepost/go/thread/view/94098/25463269/how-can-anyone-argue-that-sea-the-stars-should-be-rated-higher-than-harbinger?post_id=458946325#458946325good reply uncle puncle, sts over a mile in the 2000 beat ghan amrhas and delegator the former need to say more the latter group2 at best ., rvw in the places , but are we massively , overrating rvw , the only horse that he beat and has shown himseMon, 26 Jul 2010 00:08:59 -0500