<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Going</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going</link><description>Is there any way to calculate going corectly?</description><item><title>no t v or satellite channel or live feed is free to view mate, that is one of the smallest hidden costs</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533906623#533906623</link><description>no t v or satellite channel or live feed is free to view mate, that is one of the smallest hidden costs</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:39:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There are a number of factors which make the UK and Ireland racing different from American racing, both for Greyhounds and horses. For the horses, the way the races are run is often completely different. Many of our races are run at a slower pace in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533906313#533906313</link><description>There are a number of factors which make the UK and Ireland racing different from American racing, both for Greyhounds and horses. For the horses, the way the races are run is often completely different. Many of our races are run at a slower pace in</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:29:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>except for a brief period at clapton in the late 1960s there was no video replays until 1978.all 1970s pros were time/speed figure based but the new superior video camera pro quickly made them extinct. american horse racing closely resembles our grey</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533903699#533903699</link><description>except for a brief period at clapton in the late 1960s there was no video replays until 1978.all 1970s pros were time/speed figure based but the new superior video camera pro quickly made them extinct. american horse racing closely resembles our grey</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:51:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It is a lot of work maintaining the systems and as you get older (&amp; hopefully wealthier) you get lazierAgree 100%</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533903595#533903595</link><description>It is a lot of work maintaining the systems and as you get older (&amp; hopefully wealthier) you get lazierAgree 100%</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:48:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd say working with the figures give you a better starting point than those that don't have them. You can find the noncompetitive races quickly and you can assess performances from all tracks in a way that others cannot easily do. Even if others are</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533896685#533896685</link><description>I'd say working with the figures give you a better starting point than those that don't have them. You can find the noncompetitive races quickly and you can assess performances from all tracks in a way that others cannot easily do. Even if others are</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:36:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I didn't take it as you having a go DML, not at all</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533892741#533892741</link><description>I didn't take it as you having a go DML, not at all</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:21:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not having a go. I know plenty of pro's that use figures only on various sports, including golf (my main thing). I've never seen the appeal myself and would still never bet on figures. However, am very interested as it may stop bets at too nshortish</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533892705#533892705</link><description>Not having a go. I know plenty of pro's that use figures only on various sports, including golf (my main thing). I've never seen the appeal myself and would still never bet on figures. However, am very interested as it may stop bets at too nshortish</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:18:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>sorry stow, that's not what I meant when I said disregard improvement, of course most greyhounds improve at a certain point in their career I don't want to put too much up here for obvious reasons but my point is this improvement is largely reflected</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533892665#533892665</link><description>sorry stow, that's not what I meant when I said disregard improvement, of course most greyhounds improve at a certain point in their career I don't want to put too much up here for obvious reasons but my point is this improvement is largely reflected</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:16:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Would you say that working simply with the figures is more profitable than the eyes?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533892539#533892539</link><description>Would you say that working simply with the figures is more profitable than the eyes?</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:07:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You start from determining standard times for each track and distance combination. Mine are determined such that the graded ratings top out at ca 100 (bit less for provincial tracks).wrt ImprovementThis comes from my experience and  what I have read</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/30003957/going?post_id=533892033#533892033</link><description>You start from determining standard times for each track and distance combination. Mine are determined such that the graded ratings top out at ca 100 (bit less for provincial tracks).wrt ImprovementThis comes from my experience and  what I have read</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:30:35 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
