<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Quality of Nott &amp; Sheffield Open Races</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races</link><description>Noticed over the last couple of years the general quality of dogs running at Nott has dropped drastically with loads of stupid maidens races. The majority of dogs running in these races struggle to win A1. Also been a move from 500 to 480m races, rea</description><item><title>Cos afraid both meetings are on the bags so best interest for plenty a trouble. Very few opens in the north so trainers have no choice. Most of opens at Nott are sponsored by baldt&amp;&amp;t now so luvs a fav beaten. Two or three years ago when say 7-8 open</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519712679#519712679</link><description>Cos afraid both meetings are on the bags so best interest for plenty a trouble. Very few opens in the north so trainers have no choice. Most of opens at Nott are sponsored by baldt&amp;&amp;t now so luvs a fav beaten. Two or three years ago when say 7-8 open</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:51:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Why on earth would 'more trouble' be a reason for trainers to enter their dogs in a race? I don't get it?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519692019#519692019</link><description>Why on earth would 'more trouble' be a reason for trainers to enter their dogs in a race? I don't get it?</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:07:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mainly 480 at Sheffield?Are you sure??</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519681583#519681583</link><description>Mainly 480 at Sheffield?Are you sure??</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:40:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There isn't the dogs about any more, hence why there are more maidens which can be filled and inevitably they will be lower quality. It won't get any better with Cov opening, will just spread the dogs even thinner. I wouldn't say the move to 480 is f</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519630347#519630347</link><description>There isn't the dogs about any more, hence why there are more maidens which can be filled and inevitably they will be lower quality. It won't get any better with Cov opening, will just spread the dogs even thinner. I wouldn't say the move to 480 is f</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 04:53:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Coventry Opens advertised for standard trip of 485m, which is 5m further than the standard prior to closure.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519630317#519630317</link><description>Coventry Opens advertised for standard trip of 485m, which is 5m further than the standard prior to closure.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 04:51:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Noticed over the last couple of years the general quality of dogs running at Nott has dropped drastically with loads of stupid maidens races. The majority of dogs running in these races struggle to win A1. Also been a move from 500 to 480m races, rea</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/29114625/quality-of-nott-sheffield-open-races?post_id=519630049#519630049</link><description>Noticed over the last couple of years the general quality of dogs running at Nott has dropped drastically with loads of stupid maidens races. The majority of dogs running in these races struggle to win A1. Also been a move from 500 to 480m races, rea</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 04:27:35 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
