<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Greyhound rule 4</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/28821879/greyhound-rule-4</link><description>It seems the bookies want it all ways againWhen a trap is vacant and you've taken an early price the layers want to revert bets to the higher over-round on-course market SP, yet if a reserve comes into a race when you've taken an early price, not onl</description><item><title>Across the board. still likely to be about 110%, or less, over-round. Far better than sp, which is a farce in this day and age. It's beyond me how track bookmakers stay in business, but you only have to look at the handful standing at tracks nowadays</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/28821879/greyhound-rule-4?post_id=514645985#514645985</link><description>Across the board. still likely to be about 110%, or less, over-round. Far better than sp, which is a farce in this day and age. It's beyond me how track bookmakers stay in business, but you only have to look at the handful standing at tracks nowadays</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:36:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Revised betting is all well and good, but it would rely on all firms being responsive at news of a NR, and wouldn't they have had their cards marked? Their revised market would be based on the liabilities they have, rather than send the whole 'early'</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/28821879/greyhound-rule-4?post_id=514641495#514641495</link><description>Revised betting is all well and good, but it would rely on all firms being responsive at news of a NR, and wouldn't they have had their cards marked? Their revised market would be based on the liabilities they have, rather than send the whole 'early'</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:01:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I've been banging on about a rule 4 deduction for ages but met with fierce opposition, saying make-up of races change. Not disputing that but to be on at the ridiculously poor sp is hard to stomach. Dont think a formula for deductions is practical. W</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/28821879/greyhound-rule-4?post_id=514640193#514640193</link><description>I've been banging on about a rule 4 deduction for ages but met with fierce opposition, saying make-up of races change. Not disputing that but to be on at the ridiculously poor sp is hard to stomach. Dont think a formula for deductions is practical. W</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:22:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It seems the bookies want it all ways againWhen a trap is vacant and you've taken an early price the layers want to revert bets to the higher over-round on-course market SP, yet if a reserve comes into a race when you've taken an early price, not onl</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/greyhounds/go/thread/view/94094/28821879/greyhound-rule-4?post_id=514639247#514639247</link><description>It seems the bookies want it all ways againWhen a trap is vacant and you've taken an early price the layers want to revert bets to the higher over-round on-course market SP, yet if a reserve comes into a race when you've taken an early price, not onl</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:54:07 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
