<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: &Acirc;&pound;28.7M Traded</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded</link><description>is that a record?</description><item><title>still only adds up to an average days horse racing for betfair, that puts it in perspective.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518507211#518507211</link><description>still only adds up to an average days horse racing for betfair, that puts it in perspective.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:12:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The thing that makes no sense with BF's calculation is the doubling of the stake.  If BF want to simply reflect the amount being staked by backers on an event then fine, just show that but don't double it.But if it's reflecting the layers stake then</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518483081#518483081</link><description>The thing that makes no sense with BF's calculation is the doubling of the stake.  If BF want to simply reflect the amount being staked by backers on an event then fine, just show that but don't double it.But if it's reflecting the layers stake then</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:41:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If Betfair calculated matched volumes in the same way as BD this would have been an event that matched well in excess of &Acirc;&pound;100m. There was more than &Acirc;&pound;7m matched before the off with Woods the shortest price at 6.2. In real terms I have no doubts that</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518482209#518482209</link><description>If Betfair calculated matched volumes in the same way as BD this would have been an event that matched well in excess of &Acirc;&pound;100m. There was more than &Acirc;&pound;7m matched before the off with Woods the shortest price at 6.2. In real terms I have no doubts that</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:56:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>When it comes to the amount traded, Betfair count every dollar twice, so if $10 is bet on a player, then it shows up as $20 traded ($10 backed, $10 layed).To take the price into consideration you'd have to multiply that $10 bet by the price it matche</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518474695#518474695</link><description>When it comes to the amount traded, Betfair count every dollar twice, so if $10 is bet on a player, then it shows up as $20 traded ($10 backed, $10 layed).To take the price into consideration you'd have to multiply that $10 bet by the price it matche</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:39:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yup good stuff TB...Should have added "Most traded on a golf event"How can BF's method of calculating liquidity not take into account the prices being matched though?  I don't follow....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518465519#518465519</link><description>Yup good stuff TB...Should have added "Most traded on a golf event"How can BF's method of calculating liquidity not take into account the prices being matched though?  I don't follow....</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:00:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Interesting points TB.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518440263#518440263</link><description>Interesting points TB.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:44:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The problem with BF's method of calculating liquidity is it takes no account of prices being matched, so you can't really measure like-for like, without knowing the average price matched on the event (purple calculate this better). So it's hard to co</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518418971#518418971</link><description>The problem with BF's method of calculating liquidity is it takes no account of prices being matched, so you can't really measure like-for like, without knowing the average price matched on the event (purple calculate this better). So it's hard to co</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:52:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah....if only it was like this weekly.....i would settle for 50% of the amount traded weekly.....lets hope many got the golfing bug and stay on here</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518418263#518418263</link><description>Yeah....if only it was like this weekly.....i would settle for 50% of the amount traded weekly.....lets hope many got the golfing bug and stay on here</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:29:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Got to agree fringe. Liquidity was good this week. If only it was like this every week.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518415773#518415773</link><description>Got to agree fringe. Liquidity was good this week. If only it was like this every week.</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 08:14:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Twas great to see some constant liquidity with closer to real time pictures at last.Absolute gambling bliss, massive fluctuations, many potential winners in running and value back and lay opportunities galore.For instance, backed Louis for 5grand at</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/golf/go/thread/view/94086/29049687/287m-traded?post_id=518414095#518414095</link><description>Twas great to see some constant liquidity with closer to real time pictures at last.Absolute gambling bliss, massive fluctuations, many potential winners in running and value back and lay opportunities galore.For instance, backed Louis for 5grand at</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 07:07:42 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
