By:
This feels like it has happened before
|
By:
don't understand this. 1.01-1.05 shot's CANT win can they? thought this was a mathmatical certainty?
|
By:
where's bank 3
|
By:
1.01 this thread dissappears like all the rest :)
|
By:
wallboy 06 Nov 00:34
where's bank 3 Would have gone on Mexico yesterday anyway. 0 chance Schalke would have known the real score |
By:
Fair play to the guy, would never lay into him, but this system is bound for disaster with football bets, how many times go games have massive swings late on.
Doubt he will carry on now, but entertaining thread. |
By:
he's like the terminator. he will be back
|
By:
Schalke 04 04 Nov 21:21
next bet: D.Kiev or draw v Inter @ 1.05/.06 - £214.50 to win £12.35 while 1-0 @ 79 mins Rictus1 04 Nov 21:29 ooooh danger did warn you sorry |
By:
been away for a few days, still the same sh1te. ANOTHER loser, will he ever learn ? he'll come back and do the same
again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again what a total KN0HEAD, and anyone who defends him is just as bad. |
By:
want bet 3 ttt
|
By:
Whys he give up, he had 3 banks, one left shalke come on
|
By:
this type of layin will always result in a loss
|
By:
overall i think he still £80 up on this thread, but who know the real stakes...
|
By:
there was a 1.01 frame gubbing in the snooker which might have caught the great man out
must be one of the most mentally fragile 'punters' out there |
By:
strange schalkes not back to reconcile the account :0
|
By:
WHY WHY WHY ???????????????
Just let them be when I'm not using them anymore ! |
By:
Whys he give up, he had 3 banks, one left shalke come on
Often has a spare under the mattress too. Seen that in past challenges ;-) |
By:
Schalke 04 06 Oct 13:30
Not that many mate, I tried loads of different things with the markets on here but over time the 1.01-1.05 is the best out them all so just gonna concentrate on that, one decent run produces about £2K profit or more, so just a few runs needed to increase the amounts of the banks which will in turn increase the profits. Patience is they key and I have been working on my betting dicipline .... I am more determined than ever to succeed at this !! PRICELESS :) |
By:
whor fur art thou?
|
By:
Is he still alive???????????
|
By:
lurking....and building bank for attempt 104(c)
|
By:
Not only rebuilding his bank but he will return with a whole new approach. One which will leave us spellbound at it's inventiveness and originality. Something wild and crazy - maybe include 1.06?, who knows. One thing we can all be sure of is that he will stick with it all the way - or until he has a loser.
|
By:
^
lol |
By:
is he still seething
|
By:
No chatname specified 13 Nov 07:43
Not only rebuilding his bank but he will return with a whole new approach. One which will leave us spellbound at it's inventiveness and originality. Something wild and crazy - maybe include 1.06? PMSL :^0 |
By:
challenge over chump ya ya ya
|
By:
big weekend of sport and your missing the lot
|
By:
still in a huff
|
By:
Schalke 04 01 Nov 15:57
Been working !! It's pay week so it's a busy time for me ..... must be a very busy time for him to avoid this thread for 3 weeks!! would this have happened had he been winning?? |
By:
still sulking :|
|
By:
based on the past few years he should be back any week now tho... spread has it around 2nd-7th december.
|
By:
You think he will get one more in before the inevitable "The 2010 1.01/.02/.03/.04/.05 Challenge"?
|
By:
I hear on the grapevine that his job application for a job to dress up as ronald mcdonald at his local mcdonalds has been accepted. He said he is enjoying his new role as people dont laugh at him as much there as they do on here!!!!
|
By:
What happened to this one?
|
By:
Whey heyyyyyyyyyyyy
|
By:
lol i thought it had disappeared for good
|
By:
Interesting.
Considering a similar ploy with the nags. I don't suppose there's a thread..... |
By:
so shalke after all this nonesence did u win?
|
By:
|
By:
WHY WHY WHY?
|