First, well done on last night. I watached your scores with more interest than the CL games.
Second, here is what I was going to post later:
I, myself, have had problems getting conversations going on ratings as well. Not sure why. For me, it came down to a few years ago being paid for my time to watch and rate for some individuals. I've always used ratings and filters to create short lists to focus on. It seems you have done the same since it does not always come down to superior rating figures but the rating being put in context (make sense)
I was going to start a post on OLBG on the matter (are you a member) for ideas and approaches. I then focused on more reading and looking at different weights and am now running ratings on PL and the Australian League (re: 10 teams - wanted to see how it reacted). I was about to post that I would then set up the Championship so we could compare the ratings (retro to the beginning of the season). Mrs Shapeshifter is taking off with Shapeshifter jr and Princess Shapeshifter for ten days as of tomorrow. I am spending the time finally catching up and extending my ratings to more leagues is top on the agenda (now that there is enough results).
I more than happy to contribute to the thread further and discuss aspects once I have the Championship to speed (not long - everything automated. A week takes around 10 minutes to enter and get the ratings updated). Or, as I said, on OLBG, would seek you out there.
Anyways, t-minus 22 hours till everyone except me is packed and gone.
Either way, well done on finding an edge in a 24 team league.
MWDS, You left the pub early!First, well done on last night. I watached your scores with more interest than the CL games. Second, here is what I was going to post later:I, myself, have had problems getting conversations going on ratings as well.
i was only thinking about the A League the other day as im moving to OZ in a year or so. how accessible are the relevant stats?
it would be good to see your Championship ratings when you get them up to speed. I used to be a member at OLBG but that was ages ago and ive no idea of my username. I'll have a look and maybe set up another account as i'd be very keen to learn how i could possibly automate my ratings - i'm only a novice when it comes to Excell
cheers
MWDS - you can get me at mwdsratings @ hot.... .com
interesting, SS.i was only thinking about the A League the other day as im moving to OZ in a year or so. how accessible are the relevant stats?it would be good to see your Championship ratings when you get them up to speed. I used to be a member at O
what bets would you have using the ratings and odds below?Saturday 24th October 2009 Coca-Cola Championship Barnsley 12.75 Bristol City 12.042.58, 3 C.Palace 13.92 Nottm Forest 12.672.5, 3.05
Yes - have to check those as not at the right computer at the moment.
From memory none of those came up on mine which is the first time that's happened (I had posh as bets the other night for example, and quite a few others that you did). When i am in front of the right figures I'll put a post in (hopefully tomorrow).
Yes - have to check those as not at the right computer at the moment. From memory none of those came up on mine which is the first time that's happened (I had posh as bets the other night for example, and quite a few others that you did). When i am i
My Way De Solzen 22 Oct 14:08 what bets would you have using the ratings and odds below?
My approach on ratings is to keep the data on the outcome "based" on the ratings. An example that I have going right now on the Australian League is if the visiting squad is superior by 25 to 50%, 80% of the games are UNDER. And if the superiority of the visitors is between 1 and 10%, the home team has won 7 of 8 matches so far, 50% as underdogs.
So I would have to load your ratings of previous weeks and spot the value within consistant parameters.
I'll might take that on later tonight.
My Way De Solzen 22 Oct 14:08 what bets would you have using the ratings and odds below?My approach on ratings is to keep the data on the outcome "based" on the ratings. An example that I have going right now on the Australian League is if t
No over/under bets and back with Ipswich. Hmmm.Saturday 24th October 2009 Coca-Cola ChampionshipBarnsley 12.75 Bristol City 12.042.58, 3 C.Palace 13.92 Nottm Forest 12.672.5, 3.05 Coventry 17.45 West Brom 15.463.95, 2.2 Derby 19.25 QPR 12.582.9, 2.76
Lost a tad for the 1st time this season. Leicester saved the dirty sweep.
Still want to pick your brains re automating my ratings at some point. At the moment i do 3 leagues but am sure they would work for up to 15 others.
Lost a tad for the 1st time this season. Leicester saved the dirty sweep.Still want to pick your brains re automating my ratings at some point. At the moment i do 3 leagues but am sure they would work for up to 15 others.
Looking back I was on WBA side not cov in that game. Had derby as a marginal bet (not enough for me to have bet it) at the final prices (there was a massive gamble on QPR). Had ipswich down as a bet as you did. Leicester game was no bet.
Looking back I was on WBA side not cov in that game. Had derby as a marginal bet (not enough for me to have bet it) at the final prices (there was a massive gamble on QPR). Had ipswich down as a bet as you did. Leicester game was no bet.
2 bets, QPR and Scunny + QPR at 2.02 on the OVER 2.5 goals marketFriday 30th October 2009 Coca-Cola Championship QPR 26 Leicester 14.892, 4.4 Saturday 31st October 2009 Coca-Cola Championship
totals 1x2: 32 bets, 15 wins for + 18.61 units inc 5% comm
under/over: 14 bets, 9 wins for +3.7 units inc 5% comm
2 bets, 2 losers on the 1x2.
a winner and a good run on the UNDER/OVER
totals 1x2: 32 bets, 15 wins for + 18.61 units inc 5% communder/over: 14 bets, 9 wins for +3.7 units inc 5% comm2 bets, 2 losers on the 1x2.a winner and a good run on the UNDER/OVER
i was unmatched at 2.0 on QPR last night. 2.0 is the lowest price i will take on any bet and i think this rule has served me well. Im going to analyse the last 2 seasons bets shortly to see if i should raise the minimum even higher.
Do you have a minimum price Double_?
i was unmatched at 2.0 on QPR last night. 2.0 is the lowest price i will take on any bet and i think this rule has served me well. Im going to analyse the last 2 seasons bets shortly to see if i should raise the minimum even higher.Do you have a mini
There are occasions where I will bet at odds on, but they are sparing. I have found much better yields historically at odds against. I've also found better yields again at prices over 6/4.
So in my experience the tradeoff is between yield and strike rate. Only (IMO) bank size can make you prefer strike rate to yield, if you are a "hardened gambler" and won't slash wrists on losing runs!
There are occasions where I will bet at odds on, but they are sparing. I have found much better yields historically at odds against. I've also found better yields again at prices over 6/4.So in my experience the tradeoff is between yield and strike r
I'm starting to take my ratings to the "next level" so that rather than just "rating" how the teams stack up, it is going further and "predicting" the result.
Right now, I have teams rated then after weighing against the opponent, I look at how teams have reacted against teams of similar ratings (i.e. at home and 30% superior, "TEAM A" has won by 1 goal one time and 2 goals 3 times. TEAM B has never beaten a team rated 25% or more better when away. Thus, TEAM A becomes a strong bet).
Now I am looking at team parameters and "predicting" based on those parameters.
Simplifying, I am looking at each performance and how much a team gains or loses from the result.
This creates a max gain/min gain , min loss/max loss in the ratings. As the season progresses, it is becoming obvious that there are minimum and maximum gains a team can achieve. For example, in one category, Chelsea achieve a max gain of 40 to 45 pts on the matches they win. Tottenham; 24 to 36. etc.
From there, by combining teams and looking at this category and running simulations on scores, a frame work of possibilities can be established mainly through eliminating possibilities - example Tottenhams min and max is 24 and 36 when winning so the list of combinations that would fall into that would be drawn up. This would be done with their opponents. After comparing, some results would coincide giving a picture of (a) % of win/draw/loss (b) over under and (c) a selection of correct scores.
Has anyone else have experience in this approach?
I'm starting to take my ratings to the "next level" so that rather than just "rating" how the teams stack up, it is going further and "predicting" the result.Right now, I have teams rated then after weighing against the opponent, I look at how teams
I would have thought (if that's supposed to be a real life example) Chelsea should be able to gain LESS points as a max than Spurs, since if Spurs beat Chelsea at stamford bridge that's a more signficant result than Chelsea beating Spurs at WHL? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick from your post there SS?
I would have thought (if that's supposed to be a real life example) Chelsea should be able to gain LESS points as a max than Spurs, since if Spurs beat Chelsea at stamford bridge that's a more signficant result than Chelsea beating Spurs at WHL? Or h
I just ran two simulations from last weekend (manual right now)
For Everton/Aston Villa, it came up with 1-1 or 2-2 with 1-1 being the actual
For Arsenal Tottenham it came up with 2-1 3-1 with 3-0 as the result.
Rolling back the clock to Chelsea/Tottenham a few weeks ago, only a handful of home and away categories but it pointed to OVERS / Chelsea 2-1 3-1. But any of the predictions giving Tottenham the win fell out of the performance parameters of both teams. So the option might have been lay Spurs. The result (round 6) was 3-0. It seems the ratings offer Tottenham the potential to score against stronger teams but they didn't.
I can see it working to put in perspective. Example, saying "for a TEAM A to beat TEAM B, it would have to have its highest gain of the year. For TEAM B to beat TEAM A, it would have to play average on the road." So additional perspective that means deciding how much to wager.
The correct score would work with narrowing it to 2 results and putting into a £2 acca ;)
The ratings were from seperate games.I just ran two simulations from last weekend (manual right now)For Everton/Aston Villa, it came up with 1-1 or 2-2 with 1-1 being the actualFor Arsenal Tottenham it came up with 2-1 3-1 with 3-0 as the result.Roll
So still rough on processing but here is what it came up with for tonight:
WEST HAM 2-1 / 3-1/ DRAW 1-1 / 2-2 / 3-3 ASTON VILLA 2-3
So, it supports: LAYING ASTON VILLA Indicates value on OVERS at 2.14
Putting a point on all the above correct scores, including 2-3 puts a risk of -6 with potential of 1.5 / 5 / 12 / 19 / 70 / 35
No time to "tighten the parameters" to eliminate some of the correct scores (perhaps go with the home side and 2-1/3-1), but, as I said, looks positive for LAY VILLA and OVERS being the selections.
So still rough on processing but here is what it came up with for tonight:WEST HAM 2-1 / 3-1/ DRAW 1-1 / 2-2 / 3-3 ASTON VILLA 2-3So, it supports:LAYING ASTON VILLAIndicates value on OVERS at 2.14Putting a point on all the above correct scores, incl
WEST HAM 2-1 / 3-1/ DRAW 1-1 / 2-2 / 3-3 ASTON VILLA 2-3
So a point on each risks -6 returning in order as above: 5 / 21 1 / 12.5 / 70 35
Turning off the brain. Time for some fresh air to dissolve the geek from within.
WEST HAM 2-1 / 3-1/DRAW 1-1 / 2-2 / 3-3ASTON VILLA 2-3So a point on each risks -6returning in order as above:5 / 211 / 12.5 / 7035Turning off the brain. Time for some fresh air to dissolve the geek from within.
Ive got Sheff Wed down as a bet this weekend. I've heard they have 5 players out with illness but to be honest i ignore team news, unless it goes as far as not being able to field a team. What do you make of the match Treble _?
That correct score stuff is very interesting. I would guess that there is more scope for profit with correct scores rather than over/under 2.5 goals where the strikerate has to be very strong.
Friday 06th November 2009 Coca-Cola Championship
Derby 18.75 Coventry 15.82 2.38, 3.4
Saturday 07th November 2009 Coca-Cola Championship
Ive got Sheff Wed down as a bet this weekend. I've heard they have 5 players out with illness but to be honest i ignore team news, unless it goes as far as not being able to field a team. What do you make of the match Treble _?That correct score stuf
MWDS, when I ran it for last night, it was based on the parameters of the teams. Thus their best and worst performances so far this year.
So essentially, rather than rating afterwards, I rated before.
example: If WH had won 3-0, what would have been their change in ratings. This amount exceeded their best gain of the year so far. So this is eliminated.
So essentially a "box" is created and which scores fall into it.
WH BEST PERFORMANCE RATING - AV WORST RATING WH WORST - AV BEST WH BEST - AV BEST WH WORST - AV WORST
So any that fall into that are possibilities. Last night, six fell into it. So analytically, you are getting more of a picture rather than one team being rated higher than another. If the result last night had finished 1-1 (which it looked like), it would fall into a cube of WH playing average for home and AV playing below average on the road. The 2-1 fell into WH playing the same as 1-1 but scoring in the first half, which they did countered with AV playing average but not scoring in the first half.
The earlier games posted here were done pen and paper so probably the reason less parameters popped up.
Tightening will mean looking at form and building a bit of a curve to smooth things out (i.e. WH had a huge spike because of their performance against Arsenal. My overall ratings smooth this out but the individual matches do not).
I hope you didn't mind the postings. Like yourself, looking for feedback from those reading the thread.
MWDS, when I ran it for last night, it was based on the parameters of the teams. Thus their best and worst performances so far this year. So essentially, rather than rating afterwards, I rated before.example: If WH had won 3-0, what would have been
Thoughts on team news - it generally evens out over time. I'd be more worried if I was using Kelly and backing a team that kept drifting. At level stakes its not such a drama, although I'd wait until nearer the off to get best price. (I had sheff wed as a small bet last week, and left it and got 5.1 rather than 4.3).
Thoughts on team news - it generally evens out over time. I'd be more worried if I was using Kelly and backing a team that kept drifting. At level stakes its not such a drama, although I'd wait until nearer the off to get best price. (I had sheff wed
And a treble post - might be fair enough to have a huge spike after the arsenal game. Showed a hell of a lot of spirit and ability to come back from there. I think (as I sort of posted earlier) that that reflects the fact that arsenal risk more from a rating POV than west Ham do when they play each other.
interesting reading, your approach SS.
And a treble post - might be fair enough to have a huge spike after the arsenal game. Showed a hell of a lot of spirit and ability to come back from there. I think (as I sort of posted earlier) that that reflects the fact that arsenal risk more from
3 losers, the inevitable losing run after the streak...
totals 1x2: 35 bets, 15 wins for + 15.61 units inc 5% comm
under/over: 14 bets, 9 wins for +3.7 units inc 5% comm
3 losers, the inevitable losing run after the streak...totals 1x2: 35 bets, 15 wins for + 15.61 units inc 5% communder/over: 14 bets, 9 wins for +3.7 units inc 5% comm
Who are you, the forum police? I don't believe they employ busybody moderators on here?
If you ever bothered with the football forum, I think you'll see quite quickly why this thread is on GB rather than there. It actually has some worth and sensible discussion.
Why do people spend their time on internet fora posting about what other places a post should be in? Seriously, get out more. And be more humble, or else stick to your handle, and just be quiet.
Who are you, the forum police? I don't believe they employ busybody moderators on here? If you ever bothered with the football forum, I think you'll see quite quickly why this thread is on GB rather than there. It actually has some worth and sensible
My Way De Solzen 10 Nov 15:47 how did your correct scores go at the weekend, SHAPESHIFTER ?
I didn't fire up the premier league this weekend. My only play was going to be Chelsea on Sunday which I passed on after a decent win Saturday night on NHL that I woke up to.
Right now, the "correct score" aspect was manual on some fronts but I've now set up the grid and it will take less than a minute to enter the parameters then around three minutes to look at the match.
Like the example I had for West Ham, it will come down to giving weight to OU 2.5. As well, if the weight of results definately leans towards a team (as it did with West Ham), then the play will be notched up a bit.
I also made money last year laying +3.5. Again, if it would take TEAM A to have its best result and TEAM B to have its worst to push the score over 3.5, then, again, one more flag.
I might make a bit of effort to choose two possibilities that I'll probably throw into an acca each week with a couple of quid. If one lands in a season, great. If not, chances are with some hedging here and there, it might cost me £30 the whole season if I get shut out (last year, landed three correct score accas with more than one match (i.e. 2-1, 2-0). I spend more on the lottery!
It did point out one aspect of my ratings which I need to adjust.
Main thing is it is one more weapon in the arsenal.
Taking advantage of the break to get things to speed.
My Way De Solzen 10 Nov 15:47 how did your correct scores go at the weekend, SHAPESHIFTER ?I didn't fire up the premier league this weekend. My only play was going to be Chelsea on Sunday which I passed on after a decent win Saturday night o
getting them in early after being starved of action.2 bets only. Im tempted by palace but Cov, a shocker v WBA apart, have put up some decent figures at home recently.Since i backed QPR for the title i seem to have been backing against them every wee
Coca-Cola Championship Blackpool 24.18 Preston NE 14.82 2.2, 3.7 Cardiff City 20.28 Ipswich 19.87 1.83, 5.2
totals 1x2: 37 bets, 16 wins for + 16.7 units inc 5% communder/over: 14 bets, 9 wins for +3.7 units inc 5% commRatings for the weekend: still working out the bets but there will be a fewSaturday 28th November 2009 Coca-Cola Championship
Just looked in to see if you had barnsley down as a bet - I did. Still hurts!
I also had ipswich in, but i reckon they still owe me a few quid this season.
On blackpool also.
Backing blackpool twice MWDS?Just looked in to see if you had barnsley down as a bet - I did. Still hurts!I also had ipswich in, but i reckon they still owe me a few quid this season.On blackpool also.
Very interesting read and looks like your having great success so far 39.5% is very impressive. I'm actually looking to create for my dissertation a piece of software that automatically produces the picks for me, using a rating system. If you don't mind me asking where did you gain information as to how to create a rating system. I'm currently trying to create my own but struggling a bit. Football-data.co.uk has a very basic one using goals superiority with the last 6 games. Any help you can give me is much appreciated.
Very interesting read and looks like your having great success so far 39.5% is very impressive. I'm actually looking to create for my dissertation a piece of software that automatically produces the picks for me, using a rating system.If you don't mi
i use stats from football-data.co.uk and learned a lot from the guys who run betworld.co.uk who are old work mates of mine and who are much more experienced than me at producing ratings
feel free to email me on mwdsratings@ h otmail .com if you like
the other regular posters on this thread might also be able to contribute
jamesyoi use stats from football-data.co.uk and learned a lot from the guys who run betworld.co.uk who are old work mates of mine and who are much more experienced than me at producing ratingsfeel free to email me on mwdsratings@ h otmail .com if you
bets below + 2 bets OVER 2.5goals, Bris City v Ipswich and QPR v Boro both at around 2.1.Saturday 05th December 2009 Coca-Cola Championship Blackpool 24.75 Barnsley 12.712, 4.4 Bristol City 21.6 Ipswich 19.882.2, 3.7 C.Palace 14.5 Doncaster 11.862.02
Why Sheff Utd MWDS? Surely Plymouth are the value here, nothing in it on your ratings and Sheff unconvincing in last two wins. 5/2 at home is silly for any team in this league imo.
Why Sheff Utd MWDS? Surely Plymouth are the value here, nothing in it on your ratings and Sheff unconvincing in last two wins. 5/2 at home is silly for any team in this league imo.
any away team with a superior rating is a bet for me as long as they are 2.0+
a poor weekend for the ratings. peterboro and blackpool threw away leads late on.
QPR didn't.
any away team with a superior rating is a bet for me as long as they are 2.0+a poor weekend for the ratings. peterboro and blackpool threw away leads late on. QPR didn't.
3 bets for tomorrow , Palace, Sheff Utd and Blackpool. No under/over bets.
totals 1x2: 47 bets, 18 wins for +13.78 units inc 5% comm
under/over: 19 bets, 12 wins for +4.6 units inc 5% comm
From a high of 21.61 units up after only 26 bets it's been a bit of a struggle.
3 bets for tomorrow , Palace, Sheff Utd and Blackpool. No under/over bets.totals 1x2: 47 bets, 18 wins for +13.78 units inc 5% comm under/over: 19 bets, 12 wins for +4.6 units inc 5% comm From a high of 21.61 units up after only 26 bets it's been a b
A couple of good results in Palace and Blackpool with another short priced loser in Sheff Utd. Blackpool have put up ratings of 29.25 and 30.25 in their last 2 home draws having 25 and 23 shots respectively.
A clear sign of a team just not getting the breaks. Had they won both those games by the odd goal they'd have been 3/1 shots last night not the 11/2 i saw about an hour before kick off.
Im down a few units backing at odds of 2.0-2.4 so far this term. I'll check the figures at the end of the season but a tweak to only back at a minimum of 2.3 or 2.4 might be on the cards.
totals 1x2: 50 bets, 20 wins for +19.1 units inc 5% comm
under/over: 19 bets, 12 wins for +4.6 units inc 5% comm
i've got to be happy with an ROI of 38%. Whether that's sustainable is another matter.
How is everyone else getting on with their ratings this season? shapeshifter? treble_?
A couple of good results in Palace and Blackpool with another short priced loser in Sheff Utd. Blackpool have put up ratings of 29.25 and 30.25 in their last 2 home draws having 25 and 23 shots respectively. A clear sign of a team just not getting th
just looked in to see if you had blackpool down as a bet last night. Would have happily backed them at 4/1, so was surprised to be able to back at over 5/1. That's just the market having a very short term view of events, them crumbling against barnsley and boro slapping qpr, which led to a relatively rare BIG value bet.
Have you analysed your figures by home and away also rather than just by price?
I don't think a 40% ROI or anywhere near that is realistically acheiveable in a league where there is such public domain knowledge as there is in the championship in the long run - but I'd be happy to see you prove me wrong!
My personal results have been up and down this year, after a few good years. I'm still in front, and if it wasn't for some last minute goals going against me, i'd be a long way in front. But its still only early december, so I'm still more than hopeful of a reasonable season.
Your very low rating of forest (compared to their league position) seems to suggest to me that your ratings have them down as a lucky team which should be opposed? (if I am reading the ratings correctly that is)
just looked in to see if you had blackpool down as a bet last night. Would have happily backed them at 4/1, so was surprised to be able to back at over 5/1. That's just the market having a very short term view of events, them crumbling against barnsl
Glad you had Blackpool down as a bet Treble_U. They've been good to me this season - 5 times ive backed them, 3 times they've won for a profit of 6.4 units.
I have analysed my bets by 'home and away' and this season ive had 20 'away' bets for 16.7 units profit, dwarfing the profit made on 'home' bets. Last season, however, I got good profits from the home teams and also from backs at 2.0-2.4. I'm still working with a relatively tiny sample of bets though.
Forest are a team to oppose away from home for me.
cheers and good luck
Glad you had Blackpool down as a bet Treble_U. They've been good to me this season - 5 times ive backed them, 3 times they've won for a profit of 6.4 units.I have analysed my bets by 'home and away' and this season ive had 20 'away' bets for 16.7 uni
thanks, tym5 bets for the weekendblackpool, middlesboro, ipswich, cov and QPRSaturday 19th December 2009 Coca-Cola Championship Blackpool 25.3 West Brom 17.623.6, 2.24 Bristol City 21.94 Reading 15.6
Form Tables at Christmas - last 6 games Home last 6 Blackpool 26.29QPR 23.46Sheff Utd 23.37Ipswich 22.75Nott'm Forest 22.41Bristol City 22.19West Brom 21.83Newcastle 21.79Watford 20.87Swansea 18.58Reading 18.54
3 Boxing Day bets. Merry Christmas to all contributors to this thread!Saturday 26th December 2009 Coca-Cola Championship C.Palace 14.18 Ipswich 20.82.3, 3.45 Cardiff City 19.12 Plymouth 11.751.51, 8
Watford just about marginal - a few more ticks (which one might well get with Forests' form and profile at the moment) and that would be a bet. Although I avoided them last game for the circumstances surrounding the club - its tough to quantify them, and there's plenty more games to bet on.
Merry xmas to you as well MWDS. I like QPR and also Ipswich (as usual!) here.Watford just about marginal - a few more ticks (which one might well get with Forests' form and profile at the moment) and that would be a bet. Although I avoided them last
totals 1x2: 60 bets, 23 wins for +17.88 units inc 5% comm under/over: 20 bets, 12 wins for +3.6 units inc 5% comm3 bets, doubtful about Posh but have stuck them in anyway.Coca-Cola Championship Barnsley 14.79 Middlesbrough 17.162.
I don't separate my championship bets from my other ratings bets - so I can't tell you without a good look at the records I'm afraid.
I can tell you that I usually have at least as many bets as you - sometimes the same number, sometimes more, not noticed less. But then again I'm not getting a double digit ROI this season!
I don't separate my championship bets from my other ratings bets - so I can't tell you without a good look at the records I'm afraid.I can tell you that I usually have at least as many bets as you - sometimes the same number, sometimes more, not noti
cheers treble_ and good luck for 2009looks like 2 bets for the weekend, Ipswich (FFS) and NewcastleFriday 08th January 2010 Coca-Cola Championship West Brom 23.1 Nottm Forest 10.911.82, 5 Saturday 09th Januar
totals 1x2: 69 bets, 23 wins for +8.88 units inc 5% comm under/over: 21 bets, 13 wins for +4.7 units inc 5% comm5 losers makes it a losing streak of 11. under/over market still oving forward....slowly.1 bet for the weekend. Blackpool @ evens.Saturday
totals 1x2: 70 bets, 24 wins for +9.83 units inc 5% comm under/over: 21 bets, 13 wins for +4.7 units inc 5% comm2 late goals end the losing run.2 bets for tomorrows matches, Bristol City and Coventry.Tuesday 26th January 2010 Coca-Cola Cha
as no-one else has been keen to put up their ratings so i think i'll let it rest in peace.
i don't see any point in there being another one man thread on this forum just for the sake of it.
for what it's worth the current figs are 75 bets for +8.83 and bets on preston @5.1, watford @ 4.1 and blackpool @ 2.32 this weekend
as no-one else has been keen to put up their ratings so i think i'll let it rest in peace.i don't see any point in there being another one man thread on this forum just for the sake of it.for what it's worth the current figs are 75 bets for +8.83 and