<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Has anyone got a working address for BF's technical support?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support</link><description>Anyone who has tried to raise any kind of site issue will know how frustrating it is to go through the BF Hinderdesk with their idiot human chat-bots.Even when you escalate an issue there's a good chance the people "looking into it" will completely m</description><item><title>VardonVoo.30 Jan 21 22:45Joined: 21 Dec 01 | Topic/replies: 5,323 | Blogger: VardonVoo.'s blogIt's an awful trend these days where big corporations hide behind chat bots or at best very automaton-like humans with limited scripts so that you can never</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560454413#560454413</link><description>VardonVoo.30 Jan 21 22:45Joined: 21 Dec 01 | Topic/replies: 5,323 | Blogger: VardonVoo.'s blogIt's an awful trend these days where big corporations hide behind chat bots or at best very automaton-like humans with limited scripts so that you can never</description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 11:43:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Can't help with an email address, I'm afraid.  I do have a VIP phone number, but they won't talk to me any longer...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560450461#560450461</link><description>Can't help with an email address, I'm afraid.  I do have a VIP phone number, but they won't talk to me any longer...</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:51:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Since 20th Jan yes, on six occasions, for a mere penny on only half of those. I've never seen it in the previous twenty years, so I'm assuming it's a new site-glitch.But my query here is not about the specifics of this example - it's an appeal for a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560450441#560450441</link><description>Since 20th Jan yes, on six occasions, for a mere penny on only half of those. I've never seen it in the previous twenty years, so I'm assuming it's a new site-glitch.But my query here is not about the specifics of this example - it's an appeal for a</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:45:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That was the argument I had with them all those years ago.  The reality (in my experience of 83,811 markets, according to the Premium Charge portal), is that it's extremely rare for there to be more than a few pence disparity.I imagine BF would be qu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560450381#560450381</link><description>That was the argument I had with them all those years ago.  The reality (in my experience of 83,811 markets, according to the Premium Charge portal), is that it's extremely rare for there to be more than a few pence disparity.I imagine BF would be qu</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:32:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not certain if the total amount credited to the winning account would match the total of the rounded figures shown in the breakdown in the examples you cite, as what is displayed need not correspond with the number of decimal placers used in the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560450331#560450331</link><description>I'm not certain if the total amount credited to the winning account would match the total of the rounded figures shown in the breakdown in the examples you cite, as what is displayed need not correspond with the number of decimal placers used in the</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:19:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To give some examples of this in action based on what Gruss is showing me (without actually submitting):1) If I submit a back bet of 50p at odds of 1.01, my potential profit shows as 1p rather than the 0.5p liability that should actually be the case</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560450243#560450243</link><description>To give some examples of this in action based on what Gruss is showing me (without actually submitting):1) If I submit a back bet of 50p at odds of 1.01, my potential profit shows as 1p rather than the 0.5p liability that should actually be the case</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:57:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I can absolutely promise you that you used to be able to.  If you were matched by large volumes of backs at very small stakes, the backer would yield greater odds than those being asked for because each bet was settled individually rather than collec</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560449583#560449583</link><description>I can absolutely promise you that you used to be able to.  If you were matched by large volumes of backs at very small stakes, the backer would yield greater odds than those being asked for because each bet was settled individually rather than collec</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 13:01:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If you lay &Acirc;&pound;2500 for a risk of &Acirc;&pound;50 you cannot lose an extra &Acirc;&pound;1.36 due to a "rounding error".</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560449389#560449389</link><description>If you lay &Acirc;&pound;2500 for a risk of &Acirc;&pound;50 you cannot lose an extra &Acirc;&pound;1.36 due to a "rounding error".</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 12:09:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I imagine this is linked to very small bets (pennies - lots of them) and rounding errors.  It's been a long time since I've played around (purely to prove the point) with the backing side of it, but certainly laying you (at least used) to be able to</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560446533#560446533</link><description>I imagine this is linked to very small bets (pennies - lots of them) and rounding errors.  It's been a long time since I've played around (purely to prove the point) with the backing side of it, but certainly laying you (at least used) to be able to</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 03:33:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Anyone who has tried to raise any kind of site issue will know how frustrating it is to go through the BF Hinderdesk with their idiot human chat-bots.Even when you escalate an issue there's a good chance the people "looking into it" will completely m</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/31687485/has-anyone-got-a-working-address-for-bfs-technical-support?post_id=560446101#560446101</link><description>Anyone who has tried to raise any kind of site issue will know how frustrating it is to go through the BF Hinderdesk with their idiot human chat-bots.Even when you escalate an issue there's a good chance the people "looking into it" will completely m</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:42:12 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
