<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Backing Two in a Race</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race</link><description>Testing a selection method, where I back two in a race.I need a sensible staking plan.Previously, I looked at many a dutching or split-stake ideas , together with the various calculators.Anybody have any pointers, please?At a pinch, I can continue to</description><item><title>Still battling away with this, sean?An update would be interesting. No probs if not.Good luck anyway.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550816641#550816641</link><description>Still battling away with this, sean?An update would be interesting. No probs if not.Good luck anyway.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:31:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>At a pinch, I can continue to back each runner evenly ( two per race and every race in the meeting) and scrape a profit, but it seems wasteful.If you can do that on a regular basis then you should be giving advice not asking for it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550796669#550796669</link><description>At a pinch, I can continue to back each runner evenly ( two per race and every race in the meeting) and scrape a profit, but it seems wasteful.If you can do that on a regular basis then you should be giving advice not asking for it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 11:42:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To the OP its all about relative value of the selections.eg: you fancy two in a race they are 11/4 and 12/1 but in your mind their real chances are 5/2 and 5/1 respectively. Whilst the 11/4 has the bigger chance of winning the correct bet is to bet m</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550775101#550775101</link><description>To the OP its all about relative value of the selections.eg: you fancy two in a race they are 11/4 and 12/1 but in your mind their real chances are 5/2 and 5/1 respectively. Whilst the 11/4 has the bigger chance of winning the correct bet is to bet m</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 05:58:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Didn't play at all yesterday, but the daft system had an 8/1 and a 3/1 winner ( from 14 runners).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550555587#550555587</link><description>Didn't play at all yesterday, but the daft system had an 8/1 and a 3/1 winner ( from 14 runners).</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 05:59:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That's life, Baron.We have to try make the best of it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550555579#550555579</link><description>That's life, Baron.We have to try make the best of it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 05:57:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I tried plenty of methods even random ones that show good returns but everything turns to shit eventually....just give it time,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550550495#550550495</link><description>I tried plenty of methods even random ones that show good returns but everything turns to shit eventually....just give it time,</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:06:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks, Baron.This "daft method" is really nothing to do with me; I'd base any expectations on what the results tell me in a year's time. To date, it has done much better than expected. I don't know why and I have found no good way to tweak it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550548569#550548569</link><description>Thanks, Baron.This "daft method" is really nothing to do with me; I'd base any expectations on what the results tell me in a year's time. To date, it has done much better than expected. I don't know why and I have found no good way to tweak it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:26:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If you base your expectations for this method on self delusion you won't be disappointed when the inevitable happens.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550492979#550492979</link><description>If you base your expectations for this method on self delusion you won't be disappointed when the inevitable happens.</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:33:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Macsys,      I just cannot fathom whether the whole thing is just random; when trying to use "logic"( ahem) or even stated negatives to filter out pure "daft method" picks, the results have favoured the method over me! Because of these big-price shoc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550489931#550489931</link><description>Macsys,      I just cannot fathom whether the whole thing is just random; when trying to use "logic"( ahem) or even stated negatives to filter out pure "daft method" picks, the results have favoured the method over me! Because of these big-price shoc</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:43:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>keep us looped</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30749957/backing-two-in-a-race?post_id=550488875#550488875</link><description>keep us looped</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:28:38 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
