<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Betting at odds of 1000 for less than &Acirc;&pound;2</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2</link><description>How are people doing his?  Seeing as you can't edit the back unless you submit a &Acirc;&pound;2 bet to start with?</description><item><title>I do it frequently. I bet almost exclusively on golf, laying mostly. With the "cash out" facility, when cashing out, players I've laid at short odds are often available at 1000 and are matched for small amounts.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=550510001#550510001</link><description>I do it frequently. I bet almost exclusively on golf, laying mostly. With the "cash out" facility, when cashing out, players I've laid at short odds are often available at 1000 and are matched for small amounts.</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:28:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>you can place bets for as low as you want on geekstoy</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=550509729#550509729</link><description>you can place bets for as low as you want on geekstoy</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:08:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>@CLYDEBANK29Is this putting up @ 1000 or taking @ 1000?  If the latter my guess would be it's the cross-matcher - if you're simulating a lay of horse A by backing horse B,C,D etc then your back bets will be inversely proportional to the odds on offer</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548864959#548864959</link><description>@CLYDEBANK29Is this putting up @ 1000 or taking @ 1000?  If the latter my guess would be it's the cross-matcher - if you're simulating a lay of horse A by backing horse B,C,D etc then your back bets will be inversely proportional to the odds on offer</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 04:30:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Pretty certain that wasn't the case tim, as my recollection is I had consecutive tiny bets taken on the same selection at 1,000.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548864667#548864667</link><description>Pretty certain that wasn't the case tim, as my recollection is I had consecutive tiny bets taken on the same selection at 1,000.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 01:19:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>so i assume these are in house bots Total bets below AUD4 (UKP2?) don't show on the betting screen. Someone for years has put up very large numbers of $3 bets, because they don't show when there are no other bets at the price. Must be a winning strat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548863631#548863631</link><description>so i assume these are in house bots Total bets below AUD4 (UKP2?) don't show on the betting screen. Someone for years has put up very large numbers of $3 bets, because they don't show when there are no other bets at the price. Must be a winning strat</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 18:10:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Trading Software part of it?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548863497#548863497</link><description>Is Trading Software part of it?</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 17:32:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Could be someone's bot. There was a time when someone figured out to lay above 1000. It may not be "impossible". But I suspect it's something betfair are doing.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548861331#548861331</link><description>Could be someone's bot. There was a time when someone figured out to lay above 1000. It may not be "impossible". But I suspect it's something betfair are doing.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 13:28:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My post was for Clydebank, but then noticed you`ve got the same initials. By `on the screen`, do you mean `ladder screen`, or `graph screen`?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548860319#548860319</link><description>My post was for Clydebank, but then noticed you`ve got the same initials. By `on the screen`, do you mean `ladder screen`, or `graph screen`?</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:46:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>those were my thoughts timbu (and no,i didn't look at the graph) - but bets of &Acirc;&pound;2 do get taken that aren't shown on the screen -so i assume these are in house bots .try it somehere where there is  a minimal loss of value - it might cost you 30p or s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548859947#548859947</link><description>those were my thoughts timbu (and no,i didn't look at the graph) - but bets of &Acirc;&pound;2 do get taken that aren't shown on the screen -so i assume these are in house bots .try it somehere where there is  a minimal loss of value - it might cost you 30p or s</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 10:08:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>CB, how do you know you were first in the queue? Had you looked at the graph prior to placing the bet? Only looking at the ladder, you wouldn`t see any amount less than &Acirc;&pound;2 that might be already waiting.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30695915/betting-at-odds-of-1000-for-less-than-2?post_id=548857293#548857293</link><description>CB, how do you know you were first in the queue? Had you looked at the graph prior to placing the bet? Only looking at the ladder, you wouldn`t see any amount less than &Acirc;&pound;2 that might be already waiting.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 01:10:32 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
