New Posts For Thread: Why aren't all odds available in decimal betting ?https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-bettingfor example 33/1 ,31/1 ,51-54 61-64 etc have i missed something obvious ? seems like if youre putting a lot of money up theres a huge difference between 50 and 55 when 52 would be ideal.You get 5.1,5.2 but no 52 confused ,and i've only just cWhat pxb said, plus it means that those who parasite on others' research (by going one tick inside a market maker's price) at least have to accept more risk / lower margin by doing so, and not just make (eg) 5.001 to be ahead of 5.0 in the queue.https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547745829#547745829What pxb said, plus it means that those who parasite on others' research (by going one tick inside a market maker's price) at least have to accept more risk / lower margin by doing so, and not just make (eg) 5.001 to be ahead of 5.0 in the queue.Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:28:19 -0600The bet intervals (for example 50 to 55) were a brilliant way to get traders to put up money in markets as they ensure a worthwhile spread between buy and sell prices. Although they should have had more increments below 1.1 or 1.2 as a 0.01 incrementhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547742537#547742537The bet intervals (for example 50 to 55) were a brilliant way to get traders to put up money in markets as they ensure a worthwhile spread between buy and sell prices. Although they should have had more increments below 1.1 or 1.2 as a 0.01 incrementMon, 08 Feb 2016 17:40:01 -0600misread thread ignore my patterhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547742509#547742509misread thread ignore my patterMon, 08 Feb 2016 17:38:24 -0600Historical beginnings of betting when there was no decimilisationhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547742495#547742495Historical beginnings of betting when there was no decimilisationMon, 08 Feb 2016 17:37:20 -0600ah , never been on there or seen those odds before. just a thought really . I would have them myselfhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547738907#547738907ah , never been on there or seen those odds before. just a thought really . I would have them myselfMon, 08 Feb 2016 11:41:40 -0600Agree that it could/would make a difference but certainly not to everyone. Is it smarkets who use three decimal points on odds too backing up your suggestion of 1.015 etc.https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547738689#547738689Agree that it could/would make a difference but certainly not to everyone. Is it smarkets who use three decimal points on odds too backing up your suggestion of 1.015 etc.Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:18:47 -0600Darlo , with 1.01 and 1.02 it's the same , couldn't there be a 1.015 at that end ,or even 1.011 although it would look clumsy and those odds are rarely in use i guess . could you not have single numbers 50-55 for example , would it not be workablhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547738633#547738633Darlo , with 1.01 and 1.02 it's the same , couldn't there be a 1.015 at that end ,or even 1.011 although it would look clumsy and those odds are rarely in use i guess . could you not have single numbers 50-55 for example , would it not be workablMon, 08 Feb 2016 11:12:30 -060050 on the inverse side is 1.02100 on the inverse side is 1.01So, there's actually more possibilities between 50 and 100 anyway.https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547738549#54773854950 on the inverse side is 1.02100 on the inverse side is 1.01So, there's actually more possibilities between 50 and 100 anyway.Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:03:28 -0600for example 33/1 ,31/1 ,51-54 61-64 etc have i missed something obvious ? seems like if youre putting a lot of money up theres a huge difference between 50 and 55 when 52 would be ideal.You get 5.1,5.2 but no 52 confused ,and i've only just chttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30650307/why-arent-all-odds-available-in-decimal-betting?post_id=547738519#547738519for example 33/1 ,31/1 ,51-54 61-64 etc have i missed something obvious ? seems like if youre putting a lot of money up theres a huge difference between 50 and 55 when 52 would be ideal.You get 5.1,5.2 but no 52 confused ,and i've only just cMon, 08 Feb 2016 10:58:52 -0600