<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Back to Lay or Lay to Back?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back</link><description>If either method returns the same which method would be best in your opinion and why?</description><item><title>And you wonder why people say you don't understand the exchange concept.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542481521#542481521</link><description>And you wonder why people say you don't understand the exchange concept.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:04:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In a two runner market, there's no material difference between the two.Your words above, so why are you asking the question in your previous post?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542471441#542471441</link><description>In a two runner market, there's no material difference between the two.Your words above, so why are you asking the question in your previous post?</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 04:56:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't see what?  You'll have to dumb things down for me, ken.  As far as I can see, you say that you only like laying bets and not backing.  In a two runner market, there's no material difference between the two.  So what am I misunderstanding?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542450195#542450195</link><description>I don't see what?  You'll have to dumb things down for me, ken.  As far as I can see, you say that you only like laying bets and not backing.  In a two runner market, there's no material difference between the two.  So what am I misunderstanding?</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 12:45:43 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No diff except you don't see it, do you?Surprised you ask.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542448221#542448221</link><description>No diff except you don't see it, do you?Surprised you ask.</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:23:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ken - what's the difference between backing overs at evens and laying unders at evens?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542443711#542443711</link><description>Ken - what's the difference between backing overs at evens and laying unders at evens?</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:25:43 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>another sprinkling of golddust from the guvnor....more</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542439085#542439085</link><description>another sprinkling of golddust from the guvnor....more</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:03:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If overs is value, do you pass up on the bet simply because the selection wouldn't be unders?I am not comfortable backing, for example 'overs', correct.I prefer to be betting against things happening,I trust selling rather than buying, the market enc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542436387#542436387</link><description>If overs is value, do you pass up on the bet simply because the selection wouldn't be unders?I am not comfortable backing, for example 'overs', correct.I prefer to be betting against things happening,I trust selling rather than buying, the market enc</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:47:59 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>When 'overs' seem best I don't bet. I think you know what I mean. I don't.  If overs is value, do you pass up on the bet simply because the selection wouldn't be unders?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542432335#542432335</link><description>When 'overs' seem best I don't bet. I think you know what I mean. I don't.  If overs is value, do you pass up on the bet simply because the selection wouldn't be unders?</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 22:29:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Surely one would just need to read Racing Post back issues to remember them again? ;)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542425131#542425131</link><description>Surely one would just need to read Racing Post back issues to remember them again? ;)</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:14:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>gaI've no gripe with you or anyone and I enjoy reading the SADO thread.Ken is a good guy who is saying more than you quote.  He probably has forgot more than most people know on here. And not for bad reasons.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30383669/back-to-lay-or-lay-to-back?post_id=542424309#542424309</link><description>gaI've no gripe with you or anyone and I enjoy reading the SADO thread.Ken is a good guy who is saying more than you quote.  He probably has forgot more than most people know on here. And not for bad reasons.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:53:42 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
