<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: STATS in sports</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports</link><description>I've often said that in betting, the only people that profit from stats are the bookmakers.Perhaps a simple view but on the surface, the past is not the best way to predict the future.I've always taken the view that the 'context' of the stat is most</description><item><title>Roker...cheers for the article</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537937099#537937099</link><description>Roker...cheers for the article</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 05:10:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>This is a decent article on the different factors that can influence the outcome of a tennis match, as another poster said, a player reaching the latter stages of one tournament and then flying thousands of miles for another has to come into your con</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537851421#537851421</link><description>This is a decent article on the different factors that can influence the outcome of a tennis match, as another poster said, a player reaching the latter stages of one tournament and then flying thousands of miles for another has to come into your con</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:17:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Everything you listed, obviously, not in the stats.  But this is something that, yes, you can make note of.This would go under the column of 'context'.You can 'overthink' a selection, as well (I'm going through that right now with my racing selection</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537849739#537849739</link><description>Everything you listed, obviously, not in the stats.  But this is something that, yes, you can make note of.This would go under the column of 'context'.You can 'overthink' a selection, as well (I'm going through that right now with my racing selection</description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:31:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Do you have any idea the number of players in Tennis who tank matches / tournaments ? it happens a lot and player retiring just after the first set. Betting on lower ranked players is precarious.Also have to factor in other things, players who arrive</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537846831#537846831</link><description>Do you have any idea the number of players in Tennis who tank matches / tournaments ? it happens a lot and player retiring just after the first set. Betting on lower ranked players is precarious.Also have to factor in other things, players who arrive</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:53:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>People in bookies ....my guess on percentages :_1. Backing horses with their favourite jockeys riding em........15%2. Backing "lucky" numbers.......................................5%.3. Backing favourite............................................10%</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537836815#537836815</link><description>People in bookies ....my guess on percentages :_1. Backing horses with their favourite jockeys riding em........15%2. Backing "lucky" numbers.......................................5%.3. Backing favourite............................................10%</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 08:34:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Three things I have found that decreases the 'frog factor':a)Look at things from a different angle which will give you edge.  So when you do create a rating (based on stats), then not just a matter of 'back-checking' but putting them in context of th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537835159#537835159</link><description>Three things I have found that decreases the 'frog factor':a)Look at things from a different angle which will give you edge.  So when you do create a rating (based on stats), then not just a matter of 'back-checking' but putting them in context of th</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 06:27:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ok giving a more serious response, the bookies benefit from the stats because they generally offer prices worse than true value and stop all the people betting who are able to spot the occasions when the prices offered are actually better than value.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537834123#537834123</link><description>Ok giving a more serious response, the bookies benefit from the stats because they generally offer prices worse than true value and stop all the people betting who are able to spot the occasions when the prices offered are actually better than value.</description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:40:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>surely you have to kiss a lot of frog stats before you find a prince stat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537829551#537829551</link><description>surely you have to kiss a lot of frog stats before you find a prince stat</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:18:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>1. No, not a bookmaker but I'll often take the 'approach' when looking at an event.  I will weigh out the risks, etc, and take more than one position on an event.  My attitude is if you are going to spend time on researching an event, it's best to ma</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537829223#537829223</link><description>1. No, not a bookmaker but I'll often take the 'approach' when looking at an event.  I will weigh out the risks, etc, and take more than one position on an event.  My attitude is if you are going to spend time on researching an event, it's best to ma</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:52:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My latest koo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/30193541/stats-in-sports?post_id=537817859#537817859</link><description>My latest koo</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 02:37:47 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
