<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: A way to increase liquidity......</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity</link><description>Recently, I put forward the following idea, on the, Football Forum, on a way to increase liquidity.......I received ZERO responses. (Probably suggests that the idea is no good).So what do you think of the following idea......I am not sure whether thi</description><item><title>I agree with jt45.....Back in the good old days (2002 etc)......This is exactly how it was....A spinning clock for TEN Seconds, which you could cancel at any time.I for one, did exactly as jt45 suggested, you do not have to be excessive, just submit</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529053859#529053859</link><description>I agree with jt45.....Back in the good old days (2002 etc)......This is exactly how it was....A spinning clock for TEN Seconds, which you could cancel at any time.I for one, did exactly as jt45 suggested, you do not have to be excessive, just submit</description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:37:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Whilst it would be easy to detect persistent activity of that nature, I'm not convinced that it would be easy to counter. Regardless, the current market-maker advantages would be greatly eroded. I believe that the volume traded IR would decrease as a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529048969#529048969</link><description>Whilst it would be easy to detect persistent activity of that nature, I'm not convinced that it would be easy to counter. Regardless, the current market-maker advantages would be greatly eroded. I believe that the volume traded IR would decrease as a</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:19:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not joking at all.If someone was placing a bet on the exchange every 7 seconds (or even more frequently) and cancelling it then this would be pretty easy to detect and counter by BF Terms and Conditions in hand with a simple technical solution to blo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529048511#529048511</link><description>Not joking at all.If someone was placing a bet on the exchange every 7 seconds (or even more frequently) and cancelling it then this would be pretty easy to detect and counter by BF Terms and Conditions in hand with a simple technical solution to blo</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:57:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi llama1,If you're suggestion was introduced, it's possible that a "Professional Sniper" may submit bets near simultaneously at both 1.23 and 1.39 in the above scenario. The bet at 1.23 being subject to the bet placement delay as you observed.If he</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529047661#529047661</link><description>Hi llama1,If you're suggestion was introduced, it's possible that a "Professional Sniper" may submit bets near simultaneously at both 1.23 and 1.39 in the above scenario. The bet at 1.23 being subject to the bet placement delay as you observed.If he</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:18:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi jt45,I would have thought that a "Professional Sniper" would not waste his time on placing a speculative BACK bet in @ 1.39 in that situation, on the outside hope that someone, within the last few seconds, has placed a LAY bet at that price......S</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529044433#529044433</link><description>Hi jt45,I would have thought that a "Professional Sniper" would not waste his time on placing a speculative BACK bet in @ 1.39 in that situation, on the outside hope that someone, within the last few seconds, has placed a LAY bet at that price......S</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:06:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Boil it down, lads.Root Problem = When placing a bet, you have to wait 8 seconds for it to hit the market before you can cancel it.Solution = Allow users to cancel a bet after placement, but before the 8 seconds has elapsed and it has hit the market.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529044049#529044049</link><description>Boil it down, lads.Root Problem = When placing a bet, you have to wait 8 seconds for it to hit the market before you can cancel it.Solution = Allow users to cancel a bet after placement, but before the 8 seconds has elapsed and it has hit the market.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:54:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I meant exactly what jt45 explained... The real market maker would lose out.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529037929#529037929</link><description>I meant exactly what jt45 explained... The real market maker would lose out.</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:45:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>llama1,My interpretation of tier's example, is that it is not Punter A but the person who originally placed the unmatched bet at 1.4 (available to lay) that is being described as the 'Market-Maker'. Punter A is simply attempting to match that bet. Ti</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529036357#529036357</link><description>llama1,My interpretation of tier's example, is that it is not Punter A but the person who originally placed the unmatched bet at 1.4 (available to lay) that is being described as the 'Market-Maker'. Punter A is simply attempting to match that bet. Ti</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:56:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi tier,Thanks for being the FIRST (And probably only) person to respond......With all due respect, "Punter A" is not really a "Market Maker"....He is trying to get an instant match @ 1.40 and therefore he is suffering the 5 second delay.My idea is r</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529031011#529031011</link><description>Hi tier,Thanks for being the FIRST (And probably only) person to respond......With all due respect, "Punter A" is not really a "Market Maker"....He is trying to get an instant match @ 1.40 and therefore he is suffering the 5 second delay.My idea is r</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:54:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Your case is fair but there would also be another case other way round that would not be fair. Lets say at 1.4 there is money waiting to be matched on the back side and there is a cap between the money and on the lay side first price available is at</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29772059/a-way-to-increase-liquidity?post_id=529028809#529028809</link><description>Your case is fair but there would also be another case other way round that would not be fair. Lets say at 1.4 there is money waiting to be matched on the back side and there is a cap between the money and on the lay side first price available is at</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:39:13 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
