<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Probability Table question</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question</link><description>I want to make a simple probability table based on 2yo's that have had only two previous runs.If 'rule true' includes horses that came in first on both starts,  should 'rule false' include horses that came 2nd or worse on both previous starts (like t</description><item><title>Yes I was excluding any with 1 or 3 starts.  I was taking the data from Adrian Massey's site to compare with my own.(I don't suppose anyone would know how to 'mine' his data would they? - it's really long-winded getting anything via his interface)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question?post_id=521809389#521809389</link><description>Yes I was excluding any with 1 or 3 starts.  I was taking the data from Adrian Massey's site to compare with my own.(I don't suppose anyone would know how to 'mine' his data would they? - it's really long-winded getting anything via his interface)</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:38:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>wouldnt it be all 2yo's that have had the two starts, i.e exclude any with just 1 start.  I assume you have no data on unraced horses to exclude.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question?post_id=521764919#521764919</link><description>wouldnt it be all 2yo's that have had the two starts, i.e exclude any with just 1 start.  I assume you have no data on unraced horses to exclude.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:57:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Now I think about it, of course T &amp; F should cover all 2yo's.Sometimes I just can't see the bleedin' obvious.Thanks Andriy</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question?post_id=521747947#521747947</link><description>Now I think about it, of course T &amp; F should cover all 2yo's.Sometimes I just can't see the bleedin' obvious.Thanks Andriy</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:05:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well i presume the set (Rule True + Rule False) should cover all 2yo's. On that basis, Rule False should include horses that have won just one of the two races (either start) or have finished 2nd or worse on both starts.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question?post_id=521741825#521741825</link><description>Well i presume the set (Rule True + Rule False) should cover all 2yo's. On that basis, Rule False should include horses that have won just one of the two races (either start) or have finished 2nd or worse on both starts.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:36:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I want to make a simple probability table based on 2yo's that have had only two previous runs.If 'rule true' includes horses that came in first on both starts,  should 'rule false' include horses that came 2nd or worse on both previous starts (like t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29227403/probability-table-question?post_id=521739593#521739593</link><description>I want to make a simple probability table based on 2yo's that have had only two previous runs.If 'rule true' includes horses that came in first on both starts,  should 'rule false' include horses that came 2nd or worse on both previous starts (like t</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:37:28 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
