<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Why did RM miss out the obvious one to comment on re Oaks</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks</link><description>It was the obvious one out of all A O'B's entries.......Anyone that knows about racing would see the obvious.....Just not impressed with such appraisal of this race......ok ...after-timed.......but I never gave the race much thought ...as it was a re</description><item><title>RichWill - Thanks for spotting that little statement re the winner....All the AOB horses were in BOLD....except WAS.......the most obvious one to win.OK ....he did mention it....and stated it was lightly raced and bred for job......but compared to so</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520403785#520403785</link><description>RichWill - Thanks for spotting that little statement re the winner....All the AOB horses were in BOLD....except WAS.......the most obvious one to win.OK ....he did mention it....and stated it was lightly raced and bred for job......but compared to so</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:03:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Despite being one of the outsiders, Devotion is a big filly that I like, and Chester runner-up Betterbetterbetter and Naas third Was are lightly-raced fillies bred for the job.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520401249#520401249</link><description>Despite being one of the outsiders, Devotion is a big filly that I like, and Chester runner-up Betterbetterbetter and Naas third Was are lightly-raced fillies bred for the job.</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:00:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Where did he say that ? ....Not on post re BF ...==========================================View marketThere are plenty of strong runners in Friday's big race at Epsom but, as long as she gets the go ahead, Ryan Moore believes that his horse could be</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520399159#520399159</link><description>Where did he say that ? ....Not on post re BF ...==========================================View marketThere are plenty of strong runners in Friday's big race at Epsom but, as long as she gets the go ahead, Ryan Moore believes that his horse could be</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 10:04:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>He does mention Was.  He said "she's a lightly raced filly bred for the job".</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520388247#520388247</link><description>He does mention Was.  He said "she's a lightly raced filly bred for the job".</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:30:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is what I stated above your post.....pretty bad ommission though...as shows he does not have much of a clue re such CLASS races from punting perspective....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520382649#520382649</link><description>This is what I stated above your post.....pretty bad ommission though...as shows he does not have much of a clue re such CLASS races from punting perspective....</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:21:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>look - if you where trying to put punters away,i.e not mention the winner,anybody with a brain wouldnt totally not mention the horse as RM as done ,as its just too blatant ,than it, not to be an honest mistake,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520382241#520382241</link><description>look - if you where trying to put punters away,i.e not mention the winner,anybody with a brain wouldnt totally not mention the horse as RM as done ,as its just too blatant ,than it, not to be an honest mistake,</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:53:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>BTW ....I don't believe RM was putting punters away....it is just that, as a jockey, he ain't got much of a clue re what a punter should look for in such a class race.....31-22...just ain't good enought to back such a horse.I believe it was RM's hone</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520381971#520381971</link><description>BTW ....I don't believe RM was putting punters away....it is just that, as a jockey, he ain't got much of a clue re what a punter should look for in such a class race.....31-22...just ain't good enought to back such a horse.I believe it was RM's hone</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:34:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>1-3   WAS...............far stronger pattern of results than TWIRL!WAS = YES....had a few ...and typed wrong horse in initial post....nevertheless ...the comments are still critical of the ommission of the winner from the RM summary re AOB horses....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520381691#520381691</link><description>1-3   WAS...............far stronger pattern of results than TWIRL!WAS = YES....had a few ...and typed wrong horse in initial post....nevertheless ...the comments are still critical of the ommission of the winner from the RM summary re AOB horses....</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:12:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>31-22 ...TWIRLHas any horse in the history of OAKS won it with such a weak pattern of results?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520381643#520381643</link><description>31-22 ...TWIRLHas any horse in the history of OAKS won it with such a weak pattern of results?</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:08:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I also think all of Aidan's six deserve their place in the line-up, and Twirl appeals win and place at a very big price. =========================================================Just no idea re the patterns re winners in CLASS races..........</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29156123/why-did-rm-miss-out-the-obvious-one-to-comment-on-re-oaks?post_id=520381613#520381613</link><description>I also think all of Aidan's six deserve their place in the line-up, and Twirl appeals win and place at a very big price. =========================================================Just no idea re the patterns re winners in CLASS races..........</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:05:57 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
