<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Asymmetrical inverse odds</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29155007/asymmetrical-inverse-odds</link><description>Right, this doesn't make sense to me.The Sharapova Peng market has been liquid on Sharapova for most of the match but someone managed to get matched at 2.34 on Peng.That would indicate that cross matching is off, but I'm seeing inverse odds being put</description><item><title>sorry - of course you're right: 1.01 unmatched backs do appear as 100s to back on the other side.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29155007/asymmetrical-inverse-odds?post_id=520366183#520366183</link><description>sorry - of course you're right: 1.01 unmatched backs do appear as 100s to back on the other side.</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:14:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>soz Dstyle, what I mean is a 1.01 lay is the mathematical equivalent of a 101.0 back, not 110 back</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29155007/asymmetrical-inverse-odds?post_id=520365625#520365625</link><description>soz Dstyle, what I mean is a 1.01 lay is the mathematical equivalent of a 101.0 back, not 110 back</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 11:00:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>isn't a 1.01 lay the equivalent of a 100.0's back ? and not 110...just saying Dstyle ( I know that doesn't answer ur question , which i also want to know )</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29155007/asymmetrical-inverse-odds?post_id=520365377#520365377</link><description>isn't a 1.01 lay the equivalent of a 100.0's back ? and not 110...just saying Dstyle ( I know that doesn't answer ur question , which i also want to know )</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:54:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Right, this doesn't make sense to me.The Sharapova Peng market has been liquid on Sharapova for most of the match but someone managed to get matched at 2.34 on Peng.That would indicate that cross matching is off, but I'm seeing inverse odds being put</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/29155007/asymmetrical-inverse-odds?post_id=520362643#520362643</link><description>Right, this doesn't make sense to me.The Sharapova Peng market has been liquid on Sharapova for most of the match but someone managed to get matched at 2.34 on Peng.That would indicate that cross matching is off, but I'm seeing inverse odds being put</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:00:27 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
