<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Justified Paranoia</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia</link><description>For those that doubted me, it's all here in black and white.The Betfair SP is being skimmed.Used to be a distinct advantage to layers, but now....Kempton 99%99%98%98%101%100%Market Rasen100%98%102%100%99%101%Towcester101%99%99%101%99%100%99%Fairyhous</description><item><title>There are a number of reasons why I know where it's coming from.The overs are being skimmed off certain parts of the market.If a certain large punter were to have a strategy based on the overall overrounds, he wouldn't be bothering with the smaller l</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515462579#515462579</link><description>There are a number of reasons why I know where it's coming from.The overs are being skimmed off certain parts of the market.If a certain large punter were to have a strategy based on the overall overrounds, he wouldn't be bothering with the smaller l</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:39:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I still reckon it's some clever sod finding an edge we're all too thick to spot and taking his 0.5%. If his volumes are big enough - which they easily could be if only playing into the massive main HR markets, then that's a whole lot of wonga.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515461437#515461437</link><description>I still reckon it's some clever sod finding an edge we're all too thick to spot and taking his 0.5%. If his volumes are big enough - which they easily could be if only playing into the massive main HR markets, then that's a whole lot of wonga.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:02:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>word of mouth from excited punters made BF.  WOM can work both ways</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515458809#515458809</link><description>word of mouth from excited punters made BF.  WOM can work both ways</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:29:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Pretty much with City type in charge, big shareholder pressure from people with Casino backgrounds you have to assume they have maths wizards employed to look at every angle for slicing a bit more profit every possible way. They will use their inside</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515458385#515458385</link><description>Pretty much with City type in charge, big shareholder pressure from people with Casino backgrounds you have to assume they have maths wizards employed to look at every angle for slicing a bit more profit every possible way. They will use their inside</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:15:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Just as an aside here, one could have a case for being misled.While the historical data is provided on an as is basis, the SP advantages published are completely and utterly wrong.I found a lot of errors in the calculations.They have not withdrawn la</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515440199#515440199</link><description>Just as an aside here, one could have a case for being misled.While the historical data is provided on an as is basis, the SP advantages published are completely and utterly wrong.I found a lot of errors in the calculations.They have not withdrawn la</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:25:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No the turnover is similar and even so you'd expect more variation.When I was doing it, even though the overrounds were around 3% on UK and IRE and around 5% on AUS, there was great variation.The SP's are too consistently normal in all markets.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515439787#515439787</link><description>No the turnover is similar and even so you'd expect more variation.When I was doing it, even though the overrounds were around 3% on UK and IRE and around 5% on AUS, there was great variation.The SP's are too consistently normal in all markets.</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:15:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>what effect has PC had on SP betting.... (and all betting)people want 'free' volatility NOW....marginally underound SP - offered that</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515438215#515438215</link><description>what effect has PC had on SP betting.... (and all betting)people want 'free' volatility NOW....marginally underound SP - offered that</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:33:16 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>BTO maybe a few more are following the same strategy these days that you publicised and are laying to SP thereby tipping the balance the other way?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515429139#515429139</link><description>BTO maybe a few more are following the same strategy these days that you publicised and are laying to SP thereby tipping the balance the other way?</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:29:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Erm , multiples are offline for the moment that may be one reason for todays improved overround compared to recent trends</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515419931#515419931</link><description>Erm , multiples are offline for the moment that may be one reason for todays improved overround compared to recent trends</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:42:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To make my point more clearly: If, over a number of years the markets showed a consistent over-round it would be as logical to suggest that that was caused by an "under-round skimming bot" as it is to state that a consistent under-round (if indeed th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28866083/justified-paranoia?post_id=515419363#515419363</link><description>To make my point more clearly: If, over a number of years the markets showed a consistent over-round it would be as logical to suggest that that was caused by an "under-round skimming bot" as it is to state that a consistent under-round (if indeed th</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:27:32 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
