<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Should this alleged &Acirc;&pound;21M layer really be a scapegoat in this fiasco?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco</link><description>So far all we've been told is "If you're looking for a &Acirc;&pound;1m-plus customer, you would be barking up the wrong tree," Calvin said when questioned on ATR. "People think we are protecting the customer, but that is not the case."Seems very unlikely this p</description><item><title>And how many of those accounts are Betfair's.Always had that suspicion, pretty much confirmed of late.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514374685#514374685</link><description>And how many of those accounts are Betfair's.Always had that suspicion, pretty much confirmed of late.</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:02:43 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Was that a confession gvl?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514373373#514373373</link><description>Was that a confession gvl?</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:20:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>no i guess not, as there's feckin eejits using betfair</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514372633#514372633</link><description>no i guess not, as there's feckin eejits using betfair</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:59:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>in regards to the data protection act protecting this customeers details...when betfair link accounts for pc charge reasons, you are then able to see details of how the other accounts are doing in the portal!  is this not an important rule break from</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514372623#514372623</link><description>in regards to the data protection act protecting this customeers details...when betfair link accounts for pc charge reasons, you are then able to see details of how the other accounts are doing in the portal!  is this not an important rule break from</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:59:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not a very good analogy then is it?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514372475#514372475</link><description>Not a very good analogy then is it?</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:55:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>if by some fckup an instrument was on the system after expiry no trader would waste his time trading it, as s/he'd know the trades wouldn't stand.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514372451#514372451</link><description>if by some fckup an instrument was on the system after expiry no trader would waste his time trading it, as s/he'd know the trades wouldn't stand.</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:54:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Are you allowed to sell firms that have already folded on liffe?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514372019#514372019</link><description>Are you allowed to sell firms that have already folded on liffe?</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:41:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>a useful analogy would be liffe/ltom. they act in a similar way on the financial markets to the model outlined by mark davies. if someone fcked up in a similar fashion there's no way trades would be allowed to be settled. nor would there be any of th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514371037#514371037</link><description>a useful analogy would be liffe/ltom. they act in a similar way on the financial markets to the model outlined by mark davies. if someone fcked up in a similar fashion there's no way trades would be allowed to be settled. nor would there be any of th</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:04:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>TMIAG, in case you didn't know, a complaint about that stupid advert was upheld by the advertising authority. It was ridiculous enough with betfair being the middleman but when you add in all the middlemen traders the advert was imbecilic. Wonder how</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514368815#514368815</link><description>TMIAG, in case you didn't know, a complaint about that stupid advert was upheld by the advertising authority. It was ridiculous enough with betfair being the middleman but when you add in all the middlemen traders the advert was imbecilic. Wonder how</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:29:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I think the 21m layer is betfair themselves via their own cross matching bot which went wrong.  Can see BF going under when this is proved to be the case and they are told to pay up.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28805683/should-this-alleged-21m-layer-really-be-a-scapegoat-in-this-fiasco?post_id=514367503#514367503</link><description>I think the 21m layer is betfair themselves via their own cross matching bot which went wrong.  Can see BF going under when this is proved to be the case and they are told to pay up.</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:07:53 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
