New Posts For Thread: Green-screening & liability question....https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-questionAfternoon allJust a quick question. I've backed someone at big odds (150/1) who is now down to (3/1) in a field of 3 at similar odds, so I can now lay against my selection to "green-screen" the field. The question is, do I need to actually have the lBacking both would need more money temporarily since betfair doesn't know that they will both get matched, you might only get one of the bets matched and therefore would increase your liability on the back that didn't get matched.If you put 20 on athttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513564077#513564077Backing both would need more money temporarily since betfair doesn't know that they will both get matched, you might only get one of the bets matched and therefore would increase your liability on the back that didn't get matched.If you put 20 on atThu, 08 Dec 2011 09:23:00 -0600No. I feel I've said enoughhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513562699#513562699No. I feel I've said enoughThu, 08 Dec 2011 08:44:22 -0600Can someone clarify that please?https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513562439#513562439Can someone clarify that please?Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:36:09 -0600To clarify FAFH's already correct answer:If you lay off on the same line on the same market the maths is simple, it means it comes out of your winnings and betfair can calculate this so unless something is wierd you don't need more money.BUT: If youhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513562043#513562043To clarify FAFH's already correct answer:If you lay off on the same line on the same market the maths is simple, it means it comes out of your winnings and betfair can calculate this so unless something is wierd you don't need more money.BUT: If youThu, 08 Dec 2011 08:24:47 -0600Thanks FaFHThat's very good to know I've got the option. I only staked £20 overall (couple have fallen by the wayside), so I don't really stand to lose much. I know the smart thing to do is to take it and run, but could be kicking myself on Sunday nhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513560637#513560637Thanks FaFHThat's very good to know I've got the option. I only staked £20 overall (couple have fallen by the wayside), so I don't really stand to lose much. I know the smart thing to do is to take it and run, but could be kicking myself on Sunday nThu, 08 Dec 2011 07:43:03 -0600The answer is yes.And imo you would be extremely ill advised not to trade out of your original bet after such a huge movement in odds in your favour.But I know nothing of the Xfactor game/show, and would leave others to better advise you perhaps on thttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513560489#513560489The answer is yes.And imo you would be extremely ill advised not to trade out of your original bet after such a huge movement in odds in your favour.But I know nothing of the Xfactor game/show, and would leave others to better advise you perhaps on tThu, 08 Dec 2011 07:38:26 -0600Not at all. Apologies if it seemed like I was bragging - that's genuinely not my intention. I have no idea if I have the option open to me to lay this bet, and still don't after your reply. I do not have the liability required to cover the amount I'dhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513560043#513560043Not at all. Apologies if it seemed like I was bragging - that's genuinely not my intention. I have no idea if I have the option open to me to lay this bet, and still don't after your reply. I do not have the liability required to cover the amount I'dThu, 08 Dec 2011 07:21:24 -0600I think you must really know the answer to all your questions and are perhaps just trying to broadcast your " coup" ?Nothing wrong with that in essence.Btw if you ever try to make any wager on BF and you come up short in their " net" liability calculhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513559147#513559147I think you must really know the answer to all your questions and are perhaps just trying to broadcast your " coup" ?Nothing wrong with that in essence.Btw if you ever try to make any wager on BF and you come up short in their " net" liability calculThu, 08 Dec 2011 06:48:24 -0600Afternoon allJust a quick question. I've backed someone at big odds (150/1) who is now down to (3/1) in a field of 3 at similar odds, so I can now lay against my selection to "green-screen" the field. The question is, do I need to actually have the lhttps://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28752547/green-screening-liability-question?post_id=513558649#513558649Afternoon allJust a quick question. I've backed someone at big odds (150/1) who is now down to (3/1) in a field of 3 at similar odds, so I can now lay against my selection to "green-screen" the field. The question is, do I need to actually have the lThu, 08 Dec 2011 06:29:57 -0600