<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Anyone else tried that system of TrevH</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh</link><description>Where you lay 0-0 but back it back when odds have halved. Man.u v Spurs  makes 7 losers in a row for me.   Only for small stakes I'm glad to say but am I doing something wrong?</description><item><title>keep backing the current score is the way to go</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=506156155#506156155</link><description>keep backing the current score is the way to go</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:49:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>EYG, I used to play in most matches except the very very sparse, so your 5k rule sounds very conservative to me.MIS, I've never been one for combining bets, I like to keep it simple but good luck if you can make that work.I did look at closing the la</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=506024131#506024131</link><description>EYG, I used to play in most matches except the very very sparse, so your 5k rule sounds very conservative to me.MIS, I've never been one for combining bets, I like to keep it simple but good luck if you can make that work.I did look at closing the la</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:17:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Trev H, That is a very interesting system and obviously well researched. I assume you would only use high liquidity games to keep the edge on the time decay. A couple of thoughts - Did you ever in those early days test this over a longer period ? say</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=506013187#506013187</link><description>Trev H, That is a very interesting system and obviously well researched. I assume you would only use high liquidity games to keep the edge on the time decay. A couple of thoughts - Did you ever in those early days test this over a longer period ? say</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:49:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If there was a wide spread, the Lay side would be slightly lower and the Back side would be slightly higher than norm. The stop loss triggers when the best Back price reaches the 50% mark so it works well in that sense. Putting in a condition that wi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=506001915#506001915</link><description>If there was a wide spread, the Lay side would be slightly lower and the Back side would be slightly higher than norm. The stop loss triggers when the best Back price reaches the 50% mark so it works well in that sense. Putting in a condition that wi</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:57:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Eyg, that's interesting, I would imagine it's difficult to get the bot to close the initial lay safely? I mean if a gap in the spread appears too soon, couldn't the bot be backing at say 4.0 having laid at 12.0? And of course the greater the stake th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505974273#505974273</link><description>Eyg, that's interesting, I would imagine it's difficult to get the bot to close the initial lay safely? I mean if a gap in the spread appears too soon, couldn't the bot be backing at say 4.0 having laid at 12.0? And of course the greater the stake th</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:49:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>*considering ffs</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505921959#505921959</link><description>*considering ffs</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:52:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Half my post is missing, very apt condsidering the subject matter!I will post the rest of it if anyone is interested.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505921921#505921921</link><description>Half my post is missing, very apt condsidering the subject matter!I will post the rest of it if anyone is interested.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:51:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm glad you two ladies have kissed and made up, very touching. I botted this one up a couple of days ago, it's still early days but the initial results show a net profit of +8-10 lays a day. Obviously the liability is on the high side and will there</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505920927#505920927</link><description>I'm glad you two ladies have kissed and made up, very touching. I botted this one up a couple of days ago, it's still early days but the initial results show a net profit of +8-10 lays a day. Obviously the liability is on the high side and will there</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:29:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>U.A. Thanks for the reply, totally accepted, no offencetaken or intended. GL.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505919725#505919725</link><description>U.A. Thanks for the reply, totally accepted, no offencetaken or intended. GL.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:02:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Kenilworth, if you're using the BF website then yes it would be difficult to impossible to monitor many matches at the same time.U.A., yes some might have unrealistic expectations, in fact that's a certainty. The very method of redding-up half your b</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28221709/anyone-else-tried-that-system-of-trevh?post_id=505918679#505918679</link><description>Kenilworth, if you're using the BF website then yes it would be difficult to impossible to monitor many matches at the same time.U.A., yes some might have unrealistic expectations, in fact that's a certainty. The very method of redding-up half your b</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:38:26 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
