<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Going with the cashflow?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow</link><description>I've spend years trying to analyse teams, tables, etc. to come up with reliable outcomes in football-matches.But it's not easy.But at some point it occure to me:What if I try to follow the cashflow in betting?In betting it's all about the money and n</description><item><title>plus most of the ping pong money will be traded on the shortest price option leading to a much increased amount matched on that particular selection</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow?post_id=505295295#505295295</link><description>plus most of the ping pong money will be traded on the shortest price option leading to a much increased amount matched on that particular selection</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 02:13:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes you are wrong. The favourite will always have a disproportionate % of money matched in relation to it's price.Most people just back favourites.Prices in football come in a lot for no good reason, reacting to team news that has been available (or</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow?post_id=505282921#505282921</link><description>Yes you are wrong. The favourite will always have a disproportionate % of money matched in relation to it's price.Most people just back favourites.Prices in football come in a lot for no good reason, reacting to team news that has been available (or</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:18:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Am I wront about this way of thinking? A few years ago it worked okay but other than in some specific markets now (or unless you've identified patterns with a computer - naked eye not good enough) then things have advanced too far for it to be of muc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow?post_id=505261295#505261295</link><description>Am I wront about this way of thinking? A few years ago it worked okay but other than in some specific markets now (or unless you've identified patterns with a computer - naked eye not good enough) then things have advanced too far for it to be of muc</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 09:45:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Are most people who gamble winners?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow?post_id=505257715#505257715</link><description>Are most people who gamble winners?</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 08:25:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I've spend years trying to analyse teams, tables, etc. to come up with reliable outcomes in football-matches.But it's not easy.But at some point it occure to me:What if I try to follow the cashflow in betting?In betting it's all about the money and n</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/28201397/going-with-the-cashflow?post_id=505254183#505254183</link><description>I've spend years trying to analyse teams, tables, etc. to come up with reliable outcomes in football-matches.But it's not easy.But at some point it occure to me:What if I try to follow the cashflow in betting?In betting it's all about the money and n</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:38:51 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
