<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Calling Feck N. Eejit (Re: Compiling Your own Odds Vol IV)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv</link><description>Sorry for bothering you in your campaign against all the wrongs in your life but do you still keep score of The Mascoic Index? gearoidn@gmail.com if you don't want to post about it on here.Thanks</description><item><title>Sorry Banks, but you ducked every question I put on that thread. Your argument seemed to be built around a belief that section 9 of the gambling act allowed the GC to effectively do what they want regardless of fairness. Your continual stalking of me</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494881133#494881133</link><description>Sorry Banks, but you ducked every question I put on that thread. Your argument seemed to be built around a belief that section 9 of the gambling act allowed the GC to effectively do what they want regardless of fairness. Your continual stalking of me</description><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 05:03:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yet I gave you a severe shafting on that very subject. HTH.Quite staggering one eyed nonsense.Your lack of knowledge of gambling law was cringeworthy but not as bad as your inability to accept that you were wrong despite being presented with unambigu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494811737#494811737</link><description>Yet I gave you a severe shafting on that very subject. HTH.Quite staggering one eyed nonsense.Your lack of knowledge of gambling law was cringeworthy but not as bad as your inability to accept that you were wrong despite being presented with unambigu</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 12:12:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yet I gave you a severe shafting on that very subject. HTH.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494808725#494808725</link><description>Yet I gave you a severe shafting on that very subject. HTH.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 11:39:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The ultimate pub bore always has an opinion on everything, even the things he knows nothing about.ie you and gambling law.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494797353#494797353</link><description>The ultimate pub bore always has an opinion on everything, even the things he knows nothing about.ie you and gambling law.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 09:45:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The ultimate pub bore always has an opinion on everything, even the things he knows nothing about. That describes your presence on this thread (in fact on most threads you participate in).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494792749#494792749</link><description>The ultimate pub bore always has an opinion on everything, even the things he knows nothing about. That describes your presence on this thread (in fact on most threads you participate in).</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 08:55:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Feck is there anything you don't moan about?I reckon you must be the ultimate pub bore.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494787693#494787693</link><description>Feck is there anything you don't moan about?I reckon you must be the ultimate pub bore.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 07:52:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sorry jt, it was Kenny Clark not Stuart Dougal. Clark went as far as to suggest the lack of action against Boughera could even lead to another ref's strike.Banks, as I said, you're becoming pathetic.http://itcantbeparanoia.blogspot.com/</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494773765#494773765</link><description>Sorry jt, it was Kenny Clark not Stuart Dougal. Clark went as far as to suggest the lack of action against Boughera could even lead to another ref's strike.Banks, as I said, you're becoming pathetic.http://itcantbeparanoia.blogspot.com/</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 04:05:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Feck this thread really does show you in a very poor light indeed. I am afraid the tiny bit of credibility I assumed you had has now gone. You are a professional victim and this pervades virtually every thread you comment on.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494771049#494771049</link><description>Feck this thread really does show you in a very poor light indeed. I am afraid the tiny bit of credibility I assumed you had has now gone. You are a professional victim and this pervades virtually every thread you comment on.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 02:53:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>*Critics suggested that Bougherra should have received a suspension.But Dougal says that the SFA's hands were tied as referee Calum Murray did not deem the action as aggressive."Based on the criteria the disciplinary committee were working with, I do</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494707737#494707737</link><description>*Critics suggested that Bougherra should have received a suspension.But Dougal says that the SFA's hands were tied as referee Calum Murray did not deem the action as aggressive."Based on the criteria the disciplinary committee were working with, I do</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:41:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>...Critics suggested that Bougherra should have received a suspension.But Dougal says that the SFA's hands were tied as referee Calum Murray did not deem the action as aggressive."Based on the criteria the disciplinary committee were working with, Bu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27519321/calling-feck-n-eejit-re-compiling-your-own-odds-vol-iv?post_id=494707349#494707349</link><description>...Critics suggested that Bougherra should have received a suspension.But Dougal says that the SFA's hands were tied as referee Calum Murray did not deem the action as aggressive."Based on the criteria the disciplinary committee were working with, Bu</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:36:54 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
