<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: QUESTION OF PROBABILITY WITH A BIT MORE DEPTH</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth</link><description>Simplified but a question about probability.  Approaching things generally.A team plays 5 matches, losing the 1st match and winning 4 in a row.  In simple teams, the team wins 80% of its matches (4 for 5)It wins the 6th match.  Now, based on readings</description><item><title>Of course Tobermory has the right answer (as usual), such a boring old fart he is at times.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490651573#490651573</link><description>Of course Tobermory has the right answer (as usual), such a boring old fart he is at times.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:40:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sorry, I have tried to post a few times but firefox and betfair not friendly these days.kenilworth, have a view but not "the answer" (Only Brian Cox seems to be close to the 'answers' these days).As mentioned, starting with a basic view.  Thus, the "</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490632845#490632845</link><description>Sorry, I have tried to post a few times but firefox and betfair not friendly these days.kenilworth, have a view but not "the answer" (Only Brian Cox seems to be close to the 'answers' these days).As mentioned, starting with a basic view.  Thus, the "</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:07:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's an extreme example Maximum, though correct of course..The probablity of winning the 7th match - or any match - depnds upon the difference in abilty between the teams. The most difficult of the 6 games may have been Wolves at Home ,game 7 might</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490617993#490617993</link><description>That's an extreme example Maximum, though correct of course..The probablity of winning the 7th match - or any match - depnds upon the difference in abilty between the teams. The most difficult of the 6 games may have been Wolves at Home ,game 7 might</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:29:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>maximum, could you repeat that ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490591957#490591957</link><description>maximum, could you repeat that ?</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:59:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm tempted to jump in front of Bayes with a 1.16 lay....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490566921#490566921</link><description>I'm tempted to jump in front of Bayes with a 1.16 lay....</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:43:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This isn't a question of probability :)At its simplest the team has won 5 of 6 matches, suggesting one estimate for the 'true' probability is 83.33%.But of course this assumes all opponents are equal measure, and is a very small sample.Let's just pre</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490540693#490540693</link><description>This isn't a question of probability :)At its simplest the team has won 5 of 6 matches, suggesting one estimate for the 'true' probability is 83.33%.But of course this assumes all opponents are equal measure, and is a very small sample.Let's just pre</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:10:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>To my mind the question cannot be accurately answered due to lack information about the terms of each previous match.However, an inaccurate answer () by converting Win and Lose into a 3 points, Zero points form would be 65.85%.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490531073#490531073</link><description>To my mind the question cannot be accurately answered due to lack information about the terms of each previous match.However, an inaccurate answer () by converting Win and Lose into a 3 points, Zero points form would be 65.85%.</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 04:31:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>SHAPESHIFTER, is this one of those ''I know the answer, are you as clever as me questions '' ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490509473#490509473</link><description>SHAPESHIFTER, is this one of those ''I know the answer, are you as clever as me questions '' ?</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:22:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That's only because you have 5 nipples, a medallion, and wear an open necked shirt .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490479781#490479781</link><description>That's only because you have 5 nipples, a medallion, and wear an open necked shirt .</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:36:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>that's the reason we count in 10s btwSpeak for yourself. I count hexadecimally.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/27322181/question-of-probability-with-a-bit-more-depth?post_id=490470937#490470937</link><description>that's the reason we count in 10s btwSpeak for yourself. I count hexadecimally.</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:55:51 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
