<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Sports Betting Dynamics - disproving the naysayers so far</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far</link><description>You'll only get sensible views if and when you start to make sensible posts.</description><item><title>Start with level stake profit.  Very old fashion but removes 'fictional' staking plans.....(i.e. "I recommend 1 to 3 stars)"1 star lose1 star lose3 star lose3 star win at 2/1 = down 3 pts= chase</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484826697#484826697</link><description>Start with level stake profit.  Very old fashion but removes 'fictional' staking plans.....(i.e. "I recommend 1 to 3 stars)"1 star lose1 star lose3 star lose3 star win at 2/1 = down 3 pts= chase</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:35:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not providing a tipping service. I'm reviewing a tipping service</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484711653#484711653</link><description>I'm not providing a tipping service. I'm reviewing a tipping service</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 07:30:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The trouble I'm having, and hence my tone, is that if you're providing a tipping service, this stuff should be trivial to you.I've got nothing against tipsters (although I have against spammers) and nothing against new posters (I've posted a lot of h</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484704909#484704909</link><description>The trouble I'm having, and hence my tone, is that if you're providing a tipping service, this stuff should be trivial to you.I've got nothing against tipsters (although I have against spammers) and nothing against new posters (I've posted a lot of h</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:24:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>But I am on my super yacht!!!Can we call a truce please???!!! I think it is a valid question about when a system proves itself, if indeed it ever does.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484704797#484704797</link><description>But I am on my super yacht!!!Can we call a truce please???!!! I think it is a valid question about when a system proves itself, if indeed it ever does.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:23:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I've posted many times on how to calculate statistical significance.There are various calculators online, learn to use one.Clue: 9 out of 10 is not even close</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484704781#484704781</link><description>I've posted many times on how to calculate statistical significance.There are various calculators online, learn to use one.Clue: 9 out of 10 is not even close</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:23:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>When you're on your super yacht in Antibes.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484703373#484703373</link><description>When you're on your super yacht in Antibes.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:08:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So you are the expert ... when is it significant?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484703197#484703197</link><description>So you are the expert ... when is it significant?</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:07:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>When does a tipping service prove itself? When the sample size is statistically significant and proofed.You should be able to do the maths on that yourself.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484702721#484702721</link><description>When does a tipping service prove itself? When the sample size is statistically significant and proofed.You should be able to do the maths on that yourself.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 06:01:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well done Richiscoul.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484702373#484702373</link><description>Well done Richiscoul.</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:58:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>How does that help? What I have noticed on this forum is that there are genuine people looking for pointers alongside smug know-alls who delight in ridiculing everything that is said. Saying my post 'isn't sensible' is dumb ... you need to explain yo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26878773/sports-betting-dynamics---disproving-the-naysayers-so-far?post_id=484702053#484702053</link><description>How does that help? What I have noticed on this forum is that there are genuine people looking for pointers alongside smug know-alls who delight in ridiculing everything that is said. Saying my post 'isn't sensible' is dumb ... you need to explain yo</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:55:01 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
