<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Fading the public</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public</link><description>Or opposing the public for us non-americans. Anyone do this as there sole strategy, be it blindly ir selectively?</description><item><title>The favourite-longshot bias also pertains to bookmaker odds in the sense that on (for instance) UK horse racing you might be 10% on stakes down at the end of the season if you only backed favourites and 25% down if you backed selected 20-1 shots.The</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484245089#484245089</link><description>The favourite-longshot bias also pertains to bookmaker odds in the sense that on (for instance) UK horse racing you might be 10% on stakes down at the end of the season if you only backed favourites and 25% down if you backed selected 20-1 shots.The</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:26:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>*Every game</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484168269#484168269</link><description>*Every game</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:48:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It certainly used to be (and no longer is) the case that you could oppose the New York Yankees every week and make a profit.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484168201#484168201</link><description>It certainly used to be (and no longer is) the case that you could oppose the New York Yankees every week and make a profit.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:47:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I certainly think for certain bets the name means the odds are lower than they should be. Like liverpool pretty much all this season. I've not calced it but I wonder if you'd be significantly in profit for laying them every game, Id imagine you would</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484167989#484167989</link><description>I certainly think for certain bets the name means the odds are lower than they should be. Like liverpool pretty much all this season. I've not calced it but I wonder if you'd be significantly in profit for laying them every game, Id imagine you would</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:45:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Fading the public more applies to American Handicaps where people like to bet the favourite (the team giving points) and neglect to pay attention to the detail of the actual odds.You'd have to do your own research to see how this applies to other spo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484167645#484167645</link><description>Fading the public more applies to American Handicaps where people like to bet the favourite (the team giving points) and neglect to pay attention to the detail of the actual odds.You'd have to do your own research to see how this applies to other spo</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:42:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Favourite/Longshot bias only applies to pool betting (tote) as far as I understand it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484167433#484167433</link><description>Favourite/Longshot bias only applies to pool betting (tote) as far as I understand it.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:41:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So if the weight of money is very heavy on the fav would you be inclined to back them and assume an informed market or would you be more inclined to lay them and assume a public bias? Similarly if there was weight was on the underdog would you assume</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484158105#484158105</link><description>So if the weight of money is very heavy on the fav would you be inclined to back them and assume an informed market or would you be more inclined to lay them and assume a public bias? Similarly if there was weight was on the underdog would you assume</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:12:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Also if this does work as a strategy, then how does this work alongside the favourite/longshot bias? Surely the two can't exist together? You either have too much money on the fav pushing the odds in or not enough on the fav because of the f/l bias.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484153457#484153457</link><description>Also if this does work as a strategy, then how does this work alongside the favourite/longshot bias? Surely the two can't exist together? You either have too much money on the fav pushing the odds in or not enough on the fav because of the f/l bias.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:39:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Or opposing the public for us non-americans. Anyone do this as there sole strategy, be it blindly ir selectively?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26764957/fading-the-public?post_id=484062901#484062901</link><description>Or opposing the public for us non-americans. Anyone do this as there sole strategy, be it blindly ir selectively?</description><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:57:53 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
