<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Is anyone interested in  Goals to SHOTS ON TARGET RATIOS? why you should lay unquoted in every Man</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man</link><description>Utd game Away.How many times have Man utd scored 4 or more away this season. The answer is 0%. The key here is that unqoted in the game against Birmingham was 8.4 to lay at ko. How many shots on Goal do Man Utd Average per game?Answer 8.What % of the</description><item><title>Confusing this one Alex with armagnac posting just a few posts up</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=504281961#504281961</link><description>Confusing this one Alex with armagnac posting just a few posts up</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:30:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cripes the teapot has not changed, 4,808 posts and 99% of those are teapot's posts!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=504281769#504281769</link><description>Cripes the teapot has not changed, 4,808 posts and 99% of those are teapot's posts!</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:19:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ttt for teapot</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=504281397#504281397</link><description>ttt for teapot</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 02:57:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>jonny,take a look at Napoli, Fulham (red I think, not amber) and Hibernian (amber probably)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483049833#483049833</link><description>jonny,take a look at Napoli, Fulham (red I think, not amber) and Hibernian (amber probably)</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:42:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>welcome back jonny</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483047149#483047149</link><description>welcome back jonny</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:15:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>yes jonny, i was finding it very hard to make it pay during the 1st half..all the inicators were flashing but the goals were not coming.I simply put this down to the need to score is not as great in the 1st half as it is in the 2nd half when time is</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483033061#483033061</link><description>yes jonny, i was finding it very hard to make it pay during the 1st half..all the inicators were flashing but the goals were not coming.I simply put this down to the need to score is not as great in the 1st half as it is in the 2nd half when time is</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:11:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>armagnac you mentioned losing ht bets. I am finding that i am making very few ht bets now.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483026905#483026905</link><description>armagnac you mentioned losing ht bets. I am finding that i am making very few ht bets now.</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 04:09:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>here is mineMissed bristol city as layed 1-0 at 1.1 low when goal was 1.2.Soccer / Barcelona v Almeria : Over/Under 5.5 Goals       26-Jan-11 21:00       26-Jan-11 22:52      56.17 tradeSoccer / Hibernian v Rangers : Correct Score     26-Jan-11 19:45</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483021505#483021505</link><description>here is mineMissed bristol city as layed 1-0 at 1.1 low when goal was 1.2.Soccer / Barcelona v Almeria : Over/Under 5.5 Goals       26-Jan-11 21:00       26-Jan-11 22:52      56.17 tradeSoccer / Hibernian v Rangers : Correct Score     26-Jan-11 19:45</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:01:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>acornel i understand what you are saying but i have added more filters as i explained to you off betfair forum so amber does not mean lay a bet every time any more.In the rangers game i predicted 2-0 ft as an example.i appreciate what you are sayingw</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483021377#483021377</link><description>acornel i understand what you are saying but i have added more filters as i explained to you off betfair forum so amber does not mean lay a bet every time any more.In the rangers game i predicted 2-0 ft as an example.i appreciate what you are sayingw</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:59:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Some other goals were expected but not happen ...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26535037/is-anyone-interested-in-goals-to-shots-on-target-ratios-why-you-should-lay-unquoted-in-every-man?post_id=483020269#483020269</link><description>Some other goals were expected but not happen ...</description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:44:10 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
