<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: A little exercise to get the brain ticking over (Kelly criterion)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion</link><description>Where am I going wrong with this?Assume someone is tossing a coin and offering &Acirc;&pound;1.50 every time you call right but you only have to pay &Acirc;&pound;1 when you are wrong.If you have a starting bank of &Acirc;&pound;100. According to the Kelly Criterion on your first bet y</description><item><title>Lori wrote:So, trying that again, now I've confused people - likely including myself.100.00    16.67    lost    -16.67. . . . .  108.51 using Kellyand 52.5 + 20 + 32.5 = 105 Using level stakes.That looks a better example, sorry about that. Hopefully</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=472160253#472160253</link><description>Lori wrote:So, trying that again, now I've confused people - likely including myself.100.00    16.67    lost    -16.67. . . . .  108.51 using Kellyand 52.5 + 20 + 32.5 = 105 Using level stakes.That looks a better example, sorry about that. Hopefully</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:14:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>what you might find instructive is to look at your results if you build in a known error in your edge estimate.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=472021149#472021149</link><description>what you might find instructive is to look at your results if you build in a known error in your edge estimate.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:09:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>the optimal kelly fraction simply falls out of the derivative of the profit curve from first principles.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=472020973#472020973</link><description>the optimal kelly fraction simply falls out of the derivative of the profit curve from first principles.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:08:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No wonder the poor man topped himself. RIP.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471982385#471982385</link><description>No wonder the poor man topped himself. RIP.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:32:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, but in the first example the choice of &Acirc;&pound;10 appears to be arbitrary (I think it comes from dividing &Acirc;&pound;100 by 10 tries, thus ensuring you can't run out of money before the 10 tries are up - something Kelly, by definition, doesn't have an issue wi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471974129#471974129</link><description>Yes, but in the first example the choice of &Acirc;&pound;10 appears to be arbitrary (I think it comes from dividing &Acirc;&pound;100 by 10 tries, thus ensuring you can't run out of money before the 10 tries are up - something Kelly, by definition, doesn't have an issue wi</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:18:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just a comparison bushy (Comparing Kelly to levels)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471969033#471969033</link><description>Just a comparison bushy (Comparing Kelly to levels)</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:26:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Where's the &Acirc;&pound;10 level stake come from?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471967009#471967009</link><description>Where's the &Acirc;&pound;10 level stake come from?</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:00:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Many thanks for that Lori. I have been pressing buttons on my calculator for some time trying to get the 10-bet sequence to 'work' better than level stakes. I have been using half-Kelly betting for some time but have relied on using a calculator to w</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471959081#471959081</link><description>Many thanks for that Lori. I have been pressing buttons on my calculator for some time trying to get the 10-bet sequence to 'work' better than level stakes. I have been using half-Kelly betting for some time but have relied on using a calculator to w</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:12:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Now...who's going to win the 2 o'clock at Fontwell...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471958281#471958281</link><description>Now...who's going to win the 2 o'clock at Fontwell...</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:59:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In a similar vein, if you extend the maths to 10 throws:Winners    Prob    (K)    (L)0    0.001    16.151    01    0.010    24.226    252    0.044    36.339    503    0.117    54.508    754    0.205    81.762    1005    0.246    122.643    1256    0.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26148261/a-little-exercise-to-get-the-brain-ticking-over-kelly-criterion?post_id=471956065#471956065</link><description>In a similar vein, if you extend the maths to 10 throws:Winners    Prob    (K)    (L)0    0.001    16.151    01    0.010    24.226    252    0.044    36.339    503    0.117    54.508    754    0.205    81.762    1005    0.246    122.643    1256    0.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:15:22 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
