<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Would you?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you</link><description>Sacrifice profitability for consistency?If I leave out selections over 16.00 I make 20% lessoverall profit but make a profit every month.If I include selections over 16.00 I make more overallprofit but occasionally have 3 or 4 months with no profit.a</description><item><title>CM, are you allowed to bet in-running yet (I think you're in Oz?) or place a lay at 2.0 pre off &amp; keep bets? If so, have you looked at the results as if they had been greened at evens? I've seen high odds bets (16.0+) hit evens in running and lose te</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471208393#471208393</link><description>CM, are you allowed to bet in-running yet (I think you're in Oz?) or place a lay at 2.0 pre off &amp; keep bets? If so, have you looked at the results as if they had been greened at evens? I've seen high odds bets (16.0+) hit evens in running and lose te</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:16:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Escapee, Good post. Some good points there.I can see that if you have reached maximum scalability and now have a smaller % liability of bankper bet or lay it would be okay to include long shots.If however, you were just starting out, safety and small</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471172517#471172517</link><description>Escapee, Good post. Some good points there.I can see that if you have reached maximum scalability and now have a smaller % liability of bankper bet or lay it would be okay to include long shots.If however, you were just starting out, safety and small</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:53:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This reply posting is not working properly Hence the duplication.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471167413#471167413</link><description>This reply posting is not working properly Hence the duplication.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:46:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks for the replies.Noted your comment Lori on another thread.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471167321#471167321</link><description>Thanks for the replies.Noted your comment Lori on another thread.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:45:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks for the replies.I saw your comment Lori on another thread</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471167197#471167197</link><description>Thanks for the replies.I saw your comment Lori on another thread</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:43:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sacrifice profitability for consistency?Scaleability of stake size:Are the bet sizes limited by the bank roll size or has the bet size already reached the ammount the market will take at the price ?Utility of Money:The utility value of &Acirc;&pound;100 for a pa</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471166793#471166793</link><description>Sacrifice profitability for consistency?Scaleability of stake size:Are the bet sizes limited by the bank roll size or has the bet size already reached the ammount the market will take at the price ?Utility of Money:The utility value of &Acirc;&pound;100 for a pa</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:36:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Depends on life circumstances I guess. I'd try to get as many 16+ shots in there as I possibly could if I wasn't going to die in the meantime</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471163677#471163677</link><description>Depends on life circumstances I guess. I'd try to get as many 16+ shots in there as I possibly could if I wasn't going to die in the meantime</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:52:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Include selections.Many years from now, whilst sitting on the beach, they will be paying for those drinks with the little umbrellas in them.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471149893#471149893</link><description>Include selections.Many years from now, whilst sitting on the beach, they will be paying for those drinks with the little umbrellas in them.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:20:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sacrifice profitability for consistency?If I leave out selections over 16.00 I make 20% lessoverall profit but make a profit every month.If I include selections over 16.00 I make more overallprofit but occasionally have 3 or 4 months with no profit.a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26106789/would-you?post_id=471144993#471144993</link><description>Sacrifice profitability for consistency?If I leave out selections over 16.00 I make 20% lessoverall profit but make a profit every month.If I include selections over 16.00 I make more overallprofit but occasionally have 3 or 4 months with no profit.a</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:44:04 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
