<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Is the human thought process predictable?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable</link><description>Stephen Hawking believes the human brain is just like a calculator - you feed in certain information and you get a certain result.  However, he goes on to say that the calculations are too complex - that to replicate it's workings would require a rep</description><item><title>Thats why algorithmic trading in the new goose. Y can be 100%.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470580485#470580485</link><description>Thats why algorithmic trading in the new goose. Y can be 100%.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:41:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"it may ruin the life of a colleague ..."</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470557801#470557801</link><description>"it may ruin the life of a colleague ..."</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:04:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You are right Positive. Possibly the following moral standards apply:-- In a regular office, the % of people that would execute an action knowing it may (possibly will) the life of a colleague (or that of a 3rd party), no matter how many times they h</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470557545#470557545</link><description>You are right Positive. Possibly the following moral standards apply:-- In a regular office, the % of people that would execute an action knowing it may (possibly will) the life of a colleague (or that of a 3rd party), no matter how many times they h</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:02:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>A moral-less brain by whose standards? Everyone has a unique perception to morals as everyone has a unique trigger point to emotions, so I really dont see how that can work unless you customise it to a one-size fits all assumption of morals, which ki</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470555773#470555773</link><description>A moral-less brain by whose standards? Everyone has a unique perception to morals as everyone has a unique trigger point to emotions, so I really dont see how that can work unless you customise it to a one-size fits all assumption of morals, which ki</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:48:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Nice one saint-p.No morals on Wall St. that's for sure.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470549213#470549213</link><description>Nice one saint-p.No morals on Wall St. that's for sure.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:54:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The replication in Wall Street would have to be that of a moral-less brain, so the programmers would have less work to do, because this is basically the most efficient way to make money there.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470523333#470523333</link><description>The replication in Wall Street would have to be that of a moral-less brain, so the programmers would have less work to do, because this is basically the most efficient way to make money there.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:39:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I bet you that any useful replication of the brain by compuetrs happens on Wall St first ( if and when it ever doeas happen ).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470513669#470513669</link><description>I bet you that any useful replication of the brain by compuetrs happens on Wall St first ( if and when it ever doeas happen ).</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:56:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Geez God must be falling off his chair with laughter if he's monitoring this thread.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470513221#470513221</link><description>Geez God must be falling off his chair with laughter if he's monitoring this thread.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:51:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>One of the issues is going to be that humans like to define themselves to be special, so the definition of something that is capable of independent thought is going to be very rigorous indeed (until the machines define it to be something that they ca</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470484865#470484865</link><description>One of the issues is going to be that humans like to define themselves to be special, so the definition of something that is capable of independent thought is going to be very rigorous indeed (until the machines define it to be something that they ca</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 22:43:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>But who is adding the emotional responses? Will they not be subject to their own emotional responses about which emotional responses are better than others?The field of psychology is still developing and so, going back to my original point, we are mi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/26054545/is-the-human-thought-process-predictable?post_id=470467293#470467293</link><description>But who is adding the emotional responses? Will they not be subject to their own emotional responses about which emotional responses are better than others?The field of psychology is still developing and so, going back to my original point, we are mi</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:04:15 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
