<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Opinions wanted on system viability</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability</link><description>Hi there, my apologies if this is similar to recent threads.I am back testing a horse racing system- very laborious- not an Adrian Massey based one. After 1000 bets it is showing 1% profit on turnover- which doesn't sound much- but it produces approx</description><item><title>I'd say its viable if you are a PC payer. If not, I would work hard to refine it before putting it into practice. BFSP is great - try betting 100 stakes or even 250 stakes at SP. You move the SP, and your 1% would very soon be wiped out (if indeed it</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463330121#463330121</link><description>I'd say its viable if you are a PC payer. If not, I would work hard to refine it before putting it into practice. BFSP is great - try betting 100 stakes or even 250 stakes at SP. You move the SP, and your 1% would very soon be wiped out (if indeed it</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:50:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes, commission of 5% factored in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463323729#463323729</link><description>Yes, commission of 5% factored in</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:01:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The main thing is for a laying system - have you factored in commission?If you haven't, on those figures it's a loser.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463319069#463319069</link><description>The main thing is for a laying system - have you factored in commission?If you haven't, on those figures it's a loser.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:31:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>lolSo fifty days, forget it!Try the system for small stakes for six months and see how it is going.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463306521#463306521</link><description>lolSo fifty days, forget it!Try the system for small stakes for six months and see how it is going.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:17:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>MuqbilWith respect.........1000 bets @ approx 20 bets per day= approx 50 days testing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463290797#463290797</link><description>MuqbilWith respect.........1000 bets @ approx 20 bets per day= approx 50 days testing</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:31:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Back testing systems is dangerous with horse racing markets. The goal posts are moving all the while. If it's 20 per day, then you have obviously gone more than one year back which at least covers the complete season(s).If it is showing a profit, you</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463281013#463281013</link><description>Back testing systems is dangerous with horse racing markets. The goal posts are moving all the while. If it's 20 per day, then you have obviously gone more than one year back which at least covers the complete season(s).If it is showing a profit, you</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:25:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes interesting response. I had an inkling that theremay be an advantage using the strategy I am testing, which led me to test it in the first place. I amnot convinced however. My fear is ihavefound a 1000 bet sequence that is doing well in a long te</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463280217#463280217</link><description>Yes interesting response. I had an inkling that theremay be an advantage using the strategy I am testing, which led me to test it in the first place. I amnot convinced however. My fear is ihavefound a 1000 bet sequence that is doing well in a long te</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:19:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It is more important to identify why you believe you have an edge imo. If you have been able to consistently lay (or back) at prices that are favourable to you then you have something. If you intend to do it daily for the long term you have to know w</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463279361#463279361</link><description>It is more important to identify why you believe you have an edge imo. If you have been able to consistently lay (or back) at prices that are favourable to you then you have something. If you intend to do it daily for the long term you have to know w</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:13:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi there, my apologies if this is similar to recent threads.I am back testing a horse racing system- very laborious- not an Adrian Massey based one. After 1000 bets it is showing 1% profit on turnover- which doesn't sound much- but it produces approx</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25698721/opinions-wanted-on-system-viability?post_id=463277833#463277833</link><description>Hi there, my apologies if this is similar to recent threads.I am back testing a horse racing system- very laborious- not an Adrian Massey based one. After 1000 bets it is showing 1% profit on turnover- which doesn't sound much- but it produces approx</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:01:54 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
