<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Gambling Commission - Is this value for money ???????</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money</link><description>I&amp;#039;ve just paid my yearly fee of &Acirc;&pound;1700 to this mob. For last years "fee" I got advised to do the following;1. Move my rules further down the wall, (they were at head height  6 foot ). So if a circus comes to town and a couple of dwarfs/midgets f</description><item><title>Apologies. They were both born out of the same review which was supposedly going to give punters extra protection.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462536553#462536553</link><description>Apologies. They were both born out of the same review which was supposedly going to give punters extra protection.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:31:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I was not saying that they aren`t enforceable just that it wasn`t the GC who brought in the change.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462442365#462442365</link><description>I was not saying that they aren`t enforceable just that it wasn`t the GC who brought in the change.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:23:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2007/09/gambling-debts-.html</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462404377#462404377</link><description>http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2007/09/gambling-debts-.html</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:57:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The GC didn`t make gambling debts enforceable.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462402685#462402685</link><description>The GC didn`t make gambling debts enforceable.</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:35:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>*the bookmaker who can't pay</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462396309#462396309</link><description>*the bookmaker who can't pay</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:11:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The GC is the worst thing that ever happened to punters. By making gambling debts payable by law, it means that if a bookmaker allows someone credit way over their head the bookmaker can take everything they have including their home. Meanwhile the b</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462396197#462396197</link><description>The GC is the worst thing that ever happened to punters. By making gambling debts payable by law, it means that if a bookmaker allows someone credit way over their head the bookmaker can take everything they have including their home. Meanwhile the b</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:09:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If you followed the stats from leg 1, then this 'gateway' cannot have been included until after leg 5It shouldnt be 'cloak and dagger' for them to explain this, so all punters know how they operate the market, when a 'gateway' is included late - perh</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462122261#462122261</link><description>If you followed the stats from leg 1, then this 'gateway' cannot have been included until after leg 5It shouldnt be 'cloak and dagger' for them to explain this, so all punters know how they operate the market, when a 'gateway' is included late - perh</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:13:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Incidentally, I also requested they show running on tickets subject to weigh in when there was a stewards as otherwise the same lack of transparency would exist. They couldn't even promise to do that so they're clearly not taking the issue as serious</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462119137#462119137</link><description>Incidentally, I also requested they show running on tickets subject to weigh in when there was a stewards as otherwise the same lack of transparency would exist. They couldn't even promise to do that so they're clearly not taking the issue as serious</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:53:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>birch, one of their people contacted me by phone after I contacted the GC and started prattling on about "geteways" and how one of these gateways hadn't relayed the running on tickets for the last leg due to this "human error". I've no idea what thes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462118757#462118757</link><description>birch, one of their people contacted me by phone after I contacted the GC and started prattling on about "geteways" and how one of these gateways hadn't relayed the running on tickets for the last leg due to this "human error". I've no idea what thes</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:50:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>FeckBecause of the initial 'fraud' that they perpetrated in 1979, I would doubt they would deliberately do this in this more technological age - However I dont believe the human error line either - What would be more realistic is that a segment of da</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/25548493/gambling-commission---is-this-value-for-money?post_id=462116053#462116053</link><description>FeckBecause of the initial 'fraud' that they perpetrated in 1979, I would doubt they would deliberately do this in this more technological age - However I dont believe the human error line either - What would be more realistic is that a segment of da</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:31:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
