<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: ASA Adjudication against William Hill</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill</link><description>ASA Adjudication on William Hill Organisation LtdDate: 17 March 2010 Media:National press, Point of sale Sector:Leisure Number of complaints:1 Complaint Ref:110859 Ada. One ad, in the Racing Post, was headed </description><item><title>These ASA rulings are pointless without the companies concerned being fined.A few year's ago I owned a magazine, and a rival magazine claimed to be have the largest circulation in its niche to attract advertisers. It of course didn't and I got an ASA</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833186#420833186</link><description>These ASA rulings are pointless without the companies concerned being fined.A few year's ago I owned a magazine, and a rival magazine claimed to be have the largest circulation in its niche to attract advertisers. It of course didn't and I got an ASA</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:43:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>:0</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833090#420833090</link><description>:0</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:58:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>'Honesty', 'Truthfulness' and 'Other'--priceless!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833086#420833086</link><description>'Honesty', 'Truthfulness' and 'Other'--priceless!</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:45:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>donemyconkers 17 Mar 11:52 Interesting - I saw that Ad in one of Hill's windows the other day and thought they were on shakey ground.I though the same when I saw it!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833034#420833034</link><description>donemyconkers 17 Mar 11:52 Interesting - I saw that Ad in one of Hill's windows the other day and thought they were on shakey ground.I though the same when I saw it!</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:33:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>What happens if they just ignore the adjudication as bet365 have done with their TV ad ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833030#420833030</link><description>What happens if they just ignore the adjudication as bet365 have done with their TV ad ?</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:30:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thus confirming that it's okay to con people, so long as you don't do it again.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833026#420833026</link><description>Thus confirming that it's okay to con people, so long as you don't do it again.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:16:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>LOL Betfairy, the same thought crossed my mind.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833022#420833022</link><description>LOL Betfairy, the same thought crossed my mind.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:14:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ActionThe ads must not appear again in their current form.That punishment is a little harsh, imho.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833018#420833018</link><description>ActionThe ads must not appear again in their current form.That punishment is a little harsh, imho.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:13:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Would be great if other bookies could follow suit with "William Hill facts exposed" in their shop windows :^0</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833014#420833014</link><description>Would be great if other bookies could follow suit with "William Hill facts exposed" in their shop windows :^0</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:09:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I completely agree. I guess someone would have to make a separate complaint to Trading Standards in order for the shop windows to be looked at. That said, Trading Standards would have different terms of reference to the ASA and would also not neces</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23532234/asa-adjudication-against-william-hill?post_id=420833010#420833010</link><description>I completely agree. I guess someone would have to make a separate complaint to Trading Standards in order for the shop windows to be looked at. That said, Trading Standards would have different terms of reference to the ASA and would also not neces</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:01:05 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
