<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Fixed liabilities or level stakes in a laying strategy?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy</link><description>If, for example, a set of criteria yields selections that return only 80% of stakes to backers, what is the best way to lay the selections? Assuming that bankroll is not an issue and that the long term expected return is the same across all prices, i</description><item><title>Fixed liabilty has a psychologial and a practical edge over fixed stakes laying.Psychologicaly its less steressfull cause you dont lose the lot on winning Selections.Practicaly it is easier to see if a Method of Selection has an edge,... you can spot</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270142#420270142</link><description>Fixed liabilty has a psychologial and a practical edge over fixed stakes laying.Psychologicaly its less steressfull cause you dont lose the lot on winning Selections.Practicaly it is easier to see if a Method of Selection has an edge,... you can spot</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:28:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Lay to payout.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270138#420270138</link><description>Lay to payout.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:25:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Shouldnt do either imho</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270074#420270074</link><description>Shouldnt do either imho</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:33:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Doesn't matter in the long run as long as your bets have a positive expectationLevel backer's stake on long-pricers mean those have a far bigger effect on P&amp;L than short pricers, ie their relative importance becomes exaggerated.I think this is true w</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270070#420270070</link><description>Doesn't matter in the long run as long as your bets have a positive expectationLevel backer's stake on long-pricers mean those have a far bigger effect on P&amp;L than short pricers, ie their relative importance becomes exaggerated.I think this is true w</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:29:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You will win (or lose) the same proportion of your stakes whichever method you use, so it's more a case of doing what suits your temperament. However you might want to work out the effects of commission and premium charge for each method based on y</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270054#420270054</link><description>You will win (or lose) the same proportion of your stakes whichever method you use, so it's more a case of doing what suits your temperament. However you might want to work out the effects of commission and premium charge for each method based on y</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:30:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks guys.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270038#420270038</link><description>Thanks guys.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Doesn't matter in the long run as long as your bets have a positive expectation</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270018#420270018</link><description>Doesn't matter in the long run as long as your bets have a positive expectation</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:06:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Fixed liability = level stakes when backing.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420270002#420270002</link><description>Fixed liability = level stakes when backing.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:47:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'd go for fixed liability every time. That way, even if your strategy relies on the laying of long-priced selections, you can breathe a little more comfortably.Which ever approach you opt for however, ensure you have a firm knowledge of what sort o</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420269998#420269998</link><description>I'd go for fixed liability every time. That way, even if your strategy relies on the laying of long-priced selections, you can breathe a little more comfortably.Which ever approach you opt for however, ensure you have a firm knowledge of what sort o</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:14:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If, for example, a set of criteria yields selections that return only 80% of stakes to backers, what is the best way to lay the selections? Assuming that bankroll is not an issue and that the long term expected return is the same across all prices, i</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23518622/fixed-liabilities-or-level-stakes-in-a-laying-strategy?post_id=420269994#420269994</link><description>If, for example, a set of criteria yields selections that return only 80% of stakes to backers, what is the best way to lay the selections? Assuming that bankroll is not an issue and that the long term expected return is the same across all prices, i</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:14:11 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
