<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Statistics question</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question</link><description>If a set of criteria returns 8% winners, can anyone tell me what the expected highest run of consecutive losers would be in 4000 trials.To make it a bit more specific, what would be the highest number of consecutive losers in 4000 trials with at leas</description><item><title>Statistics don't give answers they merely raise more questions.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134494#420134494</link><description>Statistics don't give answers they merely raise more questions.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:32:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks farra.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134410#420134410</link><description>Thanks farra.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:27:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That formula estimates an outer limit to the maximum LS which is different to the mathematical expected value (76) of the distribution of all possible maximum LS's.I make a maximum LS of 99 a 0.6% chance of occurring and 99 or less 93%.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134406#420134406</link><description>That formula estimates an outer limit to the maximum LS which is different to the mathematical expected value (76) of the distribution of all possible maximum LS's.I make a maximum LS of 99 a 0.6% chance of occurring and 99 or less 93%.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:19:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Tpo2rated,I plugged in the labels, formula, and parameters but came up with 99.471 rather than farra's answer of 76, which is intuitively (and hopefully) closer to the mark.Sorry to bug you with this, but possible typo in the formula?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134378#420134378</link><description>Tpo2rated,I plugged in the labels, formula, and parameters but came up with 99.471 rather than farra's answer of 76, which is intuitively (and hopefully) closer to the mark.Sorry to bug you with this, but possible typo in the formula?</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:47:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Very useful, thanks farra/top2</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134314#420134314</link><description>Very useful, thanks farra/top2</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:29:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Statistics mean nothingarecent survey found out 42% of people dont believe in them</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134310#420134310</link><description>Statistics mean nothingarecent survey found out 42% of people dont believe in them</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:09:04 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Via a spreadsheet......Label cell A1 TrialsLabel cell B1 StrikeRate Label cell C1 LLREnter 4000 in cell A2Enter 8% in cell B2Enter formula =LOG(A2)/(LOG(1-B2)*-1) in cell C2</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134306#420134306</link><description>Via a spreadsheet......Label cell A1 TrialsLabel cell B1 StrikeRate Label cell C1 LLREnter 4000 in cell A2Enter 8% in cell B2Enter formula =LOG(A2)/(LOG(1-B2)*-1) in cell C2</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:03:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The expected is about 76. The 50% mark is about 73, you have a 50% chance it will be 73 or less and 50% chance that it will be 73 or more.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134302#420134302</link><description>The expected is about 76. The 50% mark is about 73, you have a 50% chance it will be 73 or less and 50% chance that it will be 73 or more.</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:14:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If a set of criteria returns 8% winners, can anyone tell me what the expected highest run of consecutive losers would be in 4000 trials.To make it a bit more specific, what would be the highest number of consecutive losers in 4000 trials with at leas</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23512674/statistics-question?post_id=420134298#420134298</link><description>If a set of criteria returns 8% winners, can anyone tell me what the expected highest run of consecutive losers would be in 4000 trials.To make it a bit more specific, what would be the highest number of consecutive losers in 4000 trials with at leas</description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:53:53 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
