<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Is it logical to be able to back and lay at 4999/1 or would it upset?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset</link><description>I see that skybet are offering 5000/1 on Accrington Stanley to win the FA cup. It seems a bit mean on the backer of Accrington Stanley here that he could only get 999/1.Other odds available are:Scunthorpe 2000/1Notts Co. 3000/1Brighton 3000/15000.0</description><item><title>but we already have that in the form of 1000.0 winners?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718206#419718206</link><description>but we already have that in the form of 1000.0 winners?</description><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:58:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>then 1.01 gubb would be no big deal, would have to wait for the 1.001 gubbage convention</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718190#419718190</link><description>then 1.01 gubb would be no big deal, would have to wait for the 1.001 gubbage convention</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:02:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I suspect that it will stay as it is for a while yet. It does seem unfair on the Accrington backer though. And you have to wonder how much faster the long odds would move if it was possible to offer up bigger odds. It just seems silly to be in a r</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718186#419718186</link><description>I suspect that it will stay as it is for a while yet. It does seem unfair on the Accrington backer though. And you have to wonder how much faster the long odds would move if it was possible to offer up bigger odds. It just seems silly to be in a r</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:57:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I prefer to keep it as it is.It creates the potential for 'fat finger' errors on a whole new level.Conversely, I do think it would make sense to be able to back/lay at 1.001, 1.002 etc.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718166#419718166</link><description>I prefer to keep it as it is.It creates the potential for 'fat finger' errors on a whole new level.Conversely, I do think it would make sense to be able to back/lay at 1.001, 1.002 etc.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:31:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i'm trying to lose weight if anything</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718162#419718162</link><description>i'm trying to lose weight if anything</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:25:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>GASHWAN 23 Jan 14:48 filthy arberThat is a fascinating comment Mashy. Would you like to expand?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718154#419718154</link><description>GASHWAN 23 Jan 14:48 filthy arberThat is a fascinating comment Mashy. Would you like to expand?</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:56:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>filthy arber</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718150#419718150</link><description>filthy arber</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:48:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>kneecaps likes being able to lay at 1000</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718146#419718146</link><description>kneecaps likes being able to lay at 1000</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:48:30 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>1000 increments up to 10000.0 That is logical the more I think about it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718142#419718142</link><description>1000 increments up to 10000.0 That is logical the more I think about it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:46:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I was hoping to be able to steal some at 5000.0Should we get onto betfair and ask them to move the limits?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23495046/is-it-logical-to-be-able-to-back-and-lay-at-49991-or-would-it-upset?post_id=419718138#419718138</link><description>I was hoping to be able to steal some at 5000.0Should we get onto betfair and ask them to move the limits?</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:44:41 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
